Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> New models in OO announced from Q4 2019
34C
post 8 Oct 2019, 13:43
Post #1


In depth idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,179
Joined: 31-May 07
Member No.: 1,818



'Tis a little arbitrary, but to prevent the first such round up becoming a bloated mess, how about another for everything announced from
the start of Q4 2019 until end Q3 2020? We have an entry!

Hattons, with a range of generic 4 and 6 wheel coaches, in all the liveries under the sun (almost). I can see these being both liked and
derided. Excellent for those who want RTR 'Victorian' coaches, no use for those who want specific models.

Interestingly, in their possible train formations publicity, two of the steam locos are not available RTR: the beautiful SECR D class, and
the well known LNWR Precedent 2-4-0. Do Hattons hint here at items that may emerge in OO; and possibly from sources other than
Hattons, given that they have ranged fairly widely among other manufacturer's ranges for the suggested traction?
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Richard Lee
post 8 Oct 2019, 14:18
Post #2


Engine Driver
Group Icon


Group: Plus+
Posts: 653
Joined: 30-March 12
From: Northern Bulgaria
Member No.: 12,381



From what I can gather, people really into pre-grouping will still want to make brass kits, paint and line them. On the other hand, if you are just looking for something to go with, for example, a P class, an H class, or even a Terrier that has strayed into SE&CR livery, these will be worlds better than the Hornby free-lance 4-wheeled coaches, and a lot less work with probably no less accuracy than modifying Triang clerestories or Ratio coach kits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Pennine MC
post 8 Oct 2019, 14:44
Post #3


Passed Fireman
****

Group: Members
Posts: 498
Joined: 26-August 06
From: Hull
Member No.: 840



QUOTE (Richard Lee @ 8 Oct 2019, 14:18) *
From what I can gather, people really into pre-grouping will still want to make brass kits, paint and line them. On the other hand, if you are just looking for something to go with, for example, a P class, an H class, or even a Terrier that has strayed into SE&CR livery, these will be worlds better than the Hornby free-lance 4-wheeled coaches, and a lot less work with probably no less accuracy than modifying Triang clerestories or Ratio coach kits.


I think that's just the market they're wanting to tap into - old fashioned pretty trains. Ever since the current crop of pre-Group locos began to take hold there have been calls for matching stock. I'd still maintain though that the real reason behind the loco models has had nothing to do with promoting pre-Group modelling per se; it's to sell more everyday black locos to transition era modellers who can persuade themselves that going back in period just a few more years isn't such a bad thing


--------------------
Ian Fleming

Windcutter - wagonry, weathering and wittering

Hal o' the Wynd - philosophy, punditry and politics in the high-rolling world of toy trains


Stuartp: there was very little serious attempt to think outside a 17'6" long box.

Story of my (modelling) life :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+
SRman
post 8 Oct 2019, 22:59
Post #4


Station Master
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,547
Joined: 7-February 08
From: Melbourne, Australia
Member No.: 2,453



Agreeing with both Richard and PennineMC, I will be happy to compromise for some good-looking pre-grouping coaches that look the part even if they aren't accurate for the railways I want to represent (SECR and LSWR, and possibly the Metropolitan as well). I only dabble with the pre-grouping stuff, probably because much of it is "pretty" and simply appeals to me.

As such, I fall right in the middle of that market Hatton's seem to be aiming at.

Good on them for this initiative, I say. clap.gif clap.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+
34C
post 9 Oct 2019, 10:14
Post #5


In depth idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,179
Joined: 31-May 07
Member No.: 1,818



QUOTE (Pennine MC @ 8 Oct 2019, 15:44) *
... I'd still maintain though that the real reason behind the loco models has had nothing to do with promoting pre-Group modelling per
se; it's to sell more everyday black locos to transition era modellers who can persuade themselves that going back in period just a few
more years isn't such a bad thing.

Indeed. Nothing more than near exhaustion of the viable subjects built by the Big Four and BR. With locos the most profitable item, the
net had to be cast wider to find more subjects likely to sell well.

QUOTE (Pennine MC @ 8 Oct 2019, 15:44) *
... Ever since the current crop of pre-Group locos began to take hold there have been calls for matching stock...

And of course a major retailer has access to good evidence of the market size. I would assume they have a decent CRM system (I would
in their shoes) and so can evaluate the customer inputs in a way that is out of reach of the manufacturers. Anyone can call out for
'make this, make that, I'd buy at least twenty'. But a retailer can collect the asks, and grade their credibility against the customer's
spending habits over a period of time. The requests of Mr Proven-Spender in short, are going to be the ones that are acted on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Ray Sadler
post 9 Oct 2019, 18:21
Post #6


Guard
***

Group: Members
Posts: 50
Joined: 31-December 12
Member No.: 15,210



Derision already appearing elsewhere. Let the rivet counters carry on soldering - it's a broad church - how many watchers at an exhibition would know the difference
when looking at stock from that period?

Good luck to Hattons for thinking out of the box.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Richard Johnson
post 10 Oct 2019, 08:23
Post #7


Just another modeller
Group Icon


Group: Plus+
Posts: 9,981
Joined: 19-May 06
From: Settle, UK
Member No.: 703



*** Agreed. If I am building my own locos I will research and do my best to get it as rignt as it can be, but it is my choice to do so. Actually I do not consider myself a rivet counter by the way... I reserve that for those who spend their life criticising everything and actually doing not very much at all... In my experience, the loudest of them tend to have surrisingly little actual skill anyway.

Real modellers never count rivets, they simply notice when things are missing and fix it if they can :-) :-)

As to these coaches. An excellent initiative. I also modify RTR as needed, and having a base that is at least "believable" in its core design concept saves a lot of time as it can be a canvas to add whatever detail is needed. Life is way to short to think otherwise.

rregards, Ahjay


--------------------

Direct honest advice from DCC, DC & Modelling experts

Please do visit us at Unit E, The Sidings, BD24 9RP.... right behind Settle Station.
Ph +44 (0) 1729 821 080 or email to
[email protected]
Further customer service available online at:
https://www.dccconceptsforum.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Pennine MC
post 10 Oct 2019, 11:29
Post #8


Passed Fireman
****

Group: Members
Posts: 498
Joined: 26-August 06
From: Hull
Member No.: 840



QUOTE (Richard Johnson @ 10 Oct 2019, 08:23) *
Real modellers never count rivets, they simply notice when things are missing and fix it if they can :-) :-)


Oh, how I wish there was more recognition of that simple truth...


--------------------
Ian Fleming

Windcutter - wagonry, weathering and wittering

Hal o' the Wynd - philosophy, punditry and politics in the high-rolling world of toy trains


Stuartp: there was very little serious attempt to think outside a 17'6" long box.

Story of my (modelling) life :-)
Go to the top of the page
 
+
butler-henderson
post 10 Oct 2019, 18:06
Post #9


Station Master
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,023
Joined: 28-June 08
Member No.: 3,211



QUOTE (Pennine MC @ 10 Oct 2019, 12:29) *
Oh, how I wish there was more recognition of that simple truth...

(OFF TOPIC) There was one layout I once saw that had a Rivet Counter Detector van on it which gave me the idea when thinking of a name for a pub of The Hanging Rivet Counter.
(ON TOPIC) When were the last 4 / 6 wheeled coaches in regular service ? I'm assuming somewhere like the Easingwold or K&ESR.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
34C
post 10 Oct 2019, 18:49
Post #10


In depth idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,179
Joined: 31-May 07
Member No.: 1,818



QUOTE (butler-henderson @ 10 Oct 2019, 19:06) *
When were the last 4 / 6 wheeled coaches in regular service ? I'm assuming somewhere like the Easingwold or K&ESR.

It may well have been somewhere on the former LNER system, still operating on the former GER section at handover to BR I believe.
The four wheeler used in the Titfield Thunderbolt fillum was ex Tollesbury branch...
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Adrian Swain
post 15 Oct 2019, 11:48
Post #11


Passed Fireman
****

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 6-April 16
From: Darset
Member No.: 23,994



Hi Folks And now we have another Rails/Dapol commission for the SECR D class 4.4.0. All I hope is that this time they actually make a model that is far better than their last few steam era 4mm products. With a string of below par models recently in terms of accuracy it is rather worrying that this model will join the likes of the Terrier, B4, GWR Railcar, Stove R and Diesel brake tender in being poorly researched and designed and well below the standards of the best currently available.

One of the biggest puzzles to me is the fact that in July 2012 Dapol showed a Terrier CAD for their 7mm model in the form of an IOW extended bunker A1x with Drummond chimney with only one noticeable error. By 2014 the A1x as produced was littered with errors. Even the Spectacle windows were correctly placed in 2012 but all the mistakes in 7mm were perpetuated in the 4mm version. Rails had to request retooling of the spectacle windows but the other errors remain, even those pointed out on RMweb 5 years ago. Clearly Dapol take little or no interest in correcting their errors even when they have had ample time to do so.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Ryan Allington
post 15 Oct 2019, 19:04
Post #12


Ticket Collector
**

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 3-February 18
Member No.: 151,729



In regards to the Hattons 'Genesis' coaches, I'll definitely be picking up a BR departmental coach to go with my Hornby Breakdown Crane. I may get a few BR passenger coaches for my branch line (some East Anglian branches were still using 4- and 6-wheelers in the '50s, possibly because the GER persisted with the designs for so long, though most might have disappeared by my period in 1956).

What I'm seeing of interest though is that based on the dimensions a Hattons staff member gave on the other model rail forum, it should be possibly to cut-and-shut two 4-wheelers into a GE 54' suburban, which were designed at exactly double the length of their "six-a-side" stock from the turn of the century. Depending on whether the body lengths given are other the buffers or not, it may come out slightly underlength (52.6' as opposed to the prototype's 54' over the buffers) and definitely slightly underlength (8' rather than 8'10"). Converting them to arc roofs shouldn't be too difficult, depending on how the lamp shrouds are fitted. The only real challenges would be building a new chassis and fitting new bogies; the LNWR 8' bogies offered by Ratio are the correct length, though Gresley bogies may have been fitted later as coaches went through the works - I don't know. Whatever the case, they seem a closer start point than the Ratio GWR coaches I'd previously considered for such a kitbash.

At any rate, these look like great value coaches from Hattons, which I imagine will prove popular as 'representative examples' or as a launchpad for kitbashers. Hopefully if the pre-grouping examples sell well it'll spur the larger manufacturers to try for some more accurate stock. I could see Midland, GWR, or GNR stock proving (relatively) popular, especially as all three companies have RTR locos from that period lacking in coaches.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
34C
post 16 Oct 2019, 08:07
Post #13


In depth idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,179
Joined: 31-May 07
Member No.: 1,818



QUOTE (Adrian Swain @ 15 Oct 2019, 12:48) *
And now we have another Rails/Dapol commission for the SECR D class 4.4.0.

Somewhat surprising that this superlatively beautiful 4-4-0 has had to wait this long for a RTR OO model. Development has clearly been
underway some time, as the NRM/Locomotion announcement presentation had what looks like a first set of test fit parts on show. I leave
it to those who know the prototype to gauge where it is in terms of fidelity. In terms of 'pretty', it's right there...

The interesting side issue is the implication that Hattons knew this model was in development, as it was shown in their advertising for
their 4 and 6 wheel coaches. They also showed the LNWR 2-4-0 Predecent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
Adrian Swain
post 17 Oct 2019, 16:18
Post #14


Passed Fireman
****

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 6-April 16
From: Darset
Member No.: 23,994



Hi Folks With reference Hattons 4 & 6 wheel coaches I really cannot see why a range of fictional designs with a range of different liveries is actually a better idea than a range of accurate coaches also in the same series of liveries. At least one group of modellers gets the benefit of accurate coaches whilst nobody gets accurate coaches if the designs are freelance. Provided a series of prototypes is chosen with features that are not completely unique to that railway, they should satisfy just as many modellers who do not want that specific livery and make those who model it extremely happy. Modellers have been chopping GWR clerestories and other coaches and seem quite happy with the lack of accuracy of the finished result but just imagine how happy the GWR modellers would have been if Triang had made accurate models in the first instance. I know how frustrated I was when I found it so difficult to produce other GWR coaches because the compartment spacing of the "First/Second" ?? did not match standard GWR dimensions. It would have been so easy to make that coach usable yet still the same overall length if that was a design parameter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+
butler-henderson
post 17 Oct 2019, 20:12
Post #15


Station Master
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,023
Joined: 28-June 08
Member No.: 3,211



QUOTE (Adrian Swain @ 17 Oct 2019, 17:18) *
Hi Folks With reference Hattons 4 & 6 wheel coaches I really cannot see why a range of fictional designs with a range of different liveries is actually a better idea

Presumably because of the market for a mass produced commercial venture - maybe it will lead to etched overlays from third parties like we use to have on a pretty wide scale. One thing that is quite noticeable over recent years has been the decline in the breath of detail/conversion parts/sets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS    Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th July 2020 - 22:34