I never weather my rolling stock.
But it shouldnt be too difficult. but really you barely need an airbrush to do it. too many people fall into this trap. particularly with steam loco's chalks and pastels are far more convincing.
Unfortunately the above statements are largely misleading. I do a great deal of weathering, and the addition of an airbrush to a 'weatherer' makes the task far easier and gives more realistic results overall. The airbrush give very fine control over paint application, this is crucial if you are building up layers of grime like brake dust on a diesel. For steam locos there is no better way to apply the sooty deposits that fall quite evenly along the top of the locomotive. However there is no realistic way you will replicate grease and oil creep stains with chalk or pastel, you need paint for that, pure and simple. I use artists pastels for a lot of my 'powder' work rather than weathering powders. The reason for this is that they do not have the greasy finish that some weathering powders do.
http://greengoscalerail.fotopic.net/p32472601.html
This is a standard Bachmann WD, the only additional work it has had is that it has been weathered from the pristine factory finish.
From the general toning down there is quite an amount of work replicating both grime, oils and liquids that cause weathering, and there are numerous techniques that work including application by airbrush. Theres no easy answer to what I do to a model with an airbrush if asked to weather one, as it depends on the finish of the individual loco, just as theres no hard and fast rule on if a satin/matt gloss coat is required to work on. Going from first hand knowledge and images is the best way to weather items, working from actual examples.
http://greengoscalerail.fotopic.net/p11213351.html
To do work like this without an airbrush is almost impossible
But it shouldnt be too difficult. but really you barely need an airbrush to do it. too many people fall into this trap. particularly with steam loco's chalks and pastels are far more convincing.
Unfortunately the above statements are largely misleading. I do a great deal of weathering, and the addition of an airbrush to a 'weatherer' makes the task far easier and gives more realistic results overall. The airbrush give very fine control over paint application, this is crucial if you are building up layers of grime like brake dust on a diesel. For steam locos there is no better way to apply the sooty deposits that fall quite evenly along the top of the locomotive. However there is no realistic way you will replicate grease and oil creep stains with chalk or pastel, you need paint for that, pure and simple. I use artists pastels for a lot of my 'powder' work rather than weathering powders. The reason for this is that they do not have the greasy finish that some weathering powders do.
http://greengoscalerail.fotopic.net/p32472601.html
This is a standard Bachmann WD, the only additional work it has had is that it has been weathered from the pristine factory finish.
From the general toning down there is quite an amount of work replicating both grime, oils and liquids that cause weathering, and there are numerous techniques that work including application by airbrush. Theres no easy answer to what I do to a model with an airbrush if asked to weather one, as it depends on the finish of the individual loco, just as theres no hard and fast rule on if a satin/matt gloss coat is required to work on. Going from first hand knowledge and images is the best way to weather items, working from actual examples.
http://greengoscalerail.fotopic.net/p11213351.html
To do work like this without an airbrush is almost impossible