Joined
·
2,873 Posts
I have always modelled in OO gauge although always unhappy about the scale gauge discrepancy. (I know all about the historical reasons for this.) I realise that I could try EM or P4 if I had the patience and skill but I was recently dreaming of the possiblity of one day moving to a larger scale.
Then I read that O gauge is 7mm to the foot (why the mix of metric and imperial?) on 32mm gauge. This corresponds to almost 4ft 7in so is much more accurate than OO. By the way, since HO is supposed to be half O gauge I expected to find that O gauge was 33mm. Why isn't it?
The next thing I read was that gauge 1 (why not 1 gauge?) is 10mm to the foot with 45mm gauge. That corresponds to exactly 4ft 6in so is not even as accurate as O gauge or even EM which corresponds to just over 4ft 6.5in.
Why is this? One would have thought that with that sort of size you could have had a perfectly accurate gauge/scale combination. It means that even if I can afford it I won't be moving to that scale but might, just might, one day try O gauge.
Cheers, Robert.
Then I read that O gauge is 7mm to the foot (why the mix of metric and imperial?) on 32mm gauge. This corresponds to almost 4ft 7in so is much more accurate than OO. By the way, since HO is supposed to be half O gauge I expected to find that O gauge was 33mm. Why isn't it?
The next thing I read was that gauge 1 (why not 1 gauge?) is 10mm to the foot with 45mm gauge. That corresponds to exactly 4ft 6in so is not even as accurate as O gauge or even EM which corresponds to just over 4ft 6.5in.
Why is this? One would have thought that with that sort of size you could have had a perfectly accurate gauge/scale combination. It means that even if I can afford it I won't be moving to that scale but might, just might, one day try O gauge.
Cheers, Robert.