Model Railway Forum banner
1 - 4 of 6 Posts

· In depth idiot
Joined
·
8,800 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I am sure some will recall that on the 5th November ("Remember, remember"...) 2018, a 40,000+T loaded ore train working to Port Hedland WA developed a system fault (or faults) which led to the train automatically stopping, and the driver calling in a problem. While the driver was attempting to manually make the train safe by applying the wagon brakes, it began to roll, and developed an impressive velocity powered by gravity alone, until control took the decision to put it through a crossover at a safe location, derailing almost all the vehicles. Major win for which all should be grateful: no one even slightly injured. Big heap of wrecked vehicles and iron ore in the desert, hey, it's only money.

Now naturally the Australian Transport Safety Board embarked on an investigation: but approaching three years later, still no final report, now to be issued Q4 2021. I am just so curious to read the incident analysis and recommendations. Will we see a recommendation that all train crew on these workings should have ground level capable ejector seat and parachute systems? Had whatever was the critical failure occurred while the train was moving, anyone on board would be stuck with riding into the eventual crash, with 'fingers crossed' the sole protection available...

 

· In depth idiot
Joined
·
8,800 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
...It really gets me when folks who take no interest whatsoever in foreign railways, suddenly become armchair experts when something like this occurs...
Then again a railway is a railway wherever in the world it is. (My own interest in the operational safety aspect is based on experience on a range of manufacturing plant processes, which presented significant hazard to life and property.)

And the question that was first in my mind regarding this incident was this. Were I questioned at an enquiry into this event, how to answer 'Was it a reasonable expectation that a single man could manually apply sufficient brakes on a 240+ vehicle near 3km long train, to make it safe against unintended movement should all the powered brake systems fail?'.

No.
 

· In depth idiot
Joined
·
8,800 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
It was only when I quoted you that I saw your answer to your own question...
I am all for folks being able to make their own decision without influence. Quite often the result is disappointing, but it is valuable information nonetheless. We have had a great illustration recently in Covid of what poor decisions in the seats of power cost; and this is a huge challenge for the future of an unavoidably increasingly integrated world.
 

· In depth idiot
Joined
·
8,800 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Final report's out, the link at the top of the thread will provide it.

In short: Additional brake system added to the trains. Operational staff not fully instructed on consequent essential actions, in the event this system makes an emergency stop.
 
1 - 4 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top