Model Railway Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 3 of 43 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,630 Posts
Even the German system seems to be more fallible than it first appears! There is a further problem when trying to cover several companies, as each one will have its own different key dates for introduction/withdrawal of train types or changes in liveries. Before 1948 the only events affecting the appearance of trains across all the companies were the Grouping and WW2.

I can't help thinking that for all the effort put into devising and explaining the era system it would be far easier for everyone if the catalogue/website said something like "This locomotive was in this general configuration and livery between 1956 and 1964, as were others of the same type between 1955 and 1968". This would convey more information in a clearer manner in about the same amount of space! The supplier almost certainly knows the dates from researching the prototype, and if exact dates are uncertain it would be OK to give an approximate date.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,630 Posts
QUOTE (Richard Johnson @ 16 Jul 2008, 13:36) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>As to influences on change you are simply wrong:

If you re-read my post I think you will see I am agreeing with you. Grouping and WW2 were the ONLY pre-1948 events that influenced all the companies at the same time. All the other events, whether change of CME or otherwise, only affected one company and hence can't simply be represented by an era-type system.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,630 Posts
QUOTE (john woodall @ 16 Jul 2008, 23:20) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>On the evening before its formation every item that had the old DB or DR logo on it had a sticker placed on it with the new DBAG logo (only the Germans would have done that!)

Actually the GNER, Midland Mainline, Central Trains and Virgin (Cross Country) logos were eliminated pretty much overnight by the new owners last autumn.

Sorry for threadnapping.
 
1 - 3 of 43 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top