QUOTE (72C @ 7 Jan 2009, 17:12)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>What is the attraction of any particle board such as Sundela, did someone back in the 60's who wrote in the model press have shares in the company?
All particle boards absorb water, the UK is a damp climate and our layout rooms tend not to be the prime habitable room within the property.
Particle boards tend to create carcinogenic airborne particles when sanded or cut (MDF is particularly bad) and need extra bracing compared to plywood.
No doubt there is someone with a layout made from chipboard with 2"x1" bracing that has absolutely no problems and I am sure that there a lot more guys who wished that they had used decent plywood but chose not to admit it.
72C,
The attraction of Sundeala is because it has been promoted by Peco as a baseboard material (and used on all their layouts at Pecorama) for many years and Sundeala, naturally advertise in Railway Modeller, Peco's publication.
It is an awful material for all the reasons you indicate. Advocates of it will tell you that if you add more support, it's OK, but my experience over the years of having to help people out of their 'Sundeala disasters' has been that no matter what you do to it, Sundeala always finds a way to curl at the edges, warp, bulge or sag. It's already expensive and by the time you add up the cost of all the extra support (which won't solve its problems anyway), you'll find that you've spent more money than you would have had you gone ply in the first place.
The only thing I am pleased to say is that the stuff is only available in the UK and that the rest of the world doesn't have to suffer from the stuff!!
The only good property of Sundeala is that it's great for the 'track pin brigade'.
I came across far more failures with Sundeala than successes when I lived in the UK, but you are right, people choose not to admit the failures!
Like Richard Johnson, I am a strong advocate of encouraging 'best practice' and like him, it's 12mm ply for me.
Graham Plowman