Model Railway Forum banner
1 - 10 of 48 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (Brian @ 16 Oct 2007, 17:32) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I have to agree with MMD
Conventional operation of points by levers, stud & probe or centre off sprung switches from a central control panel is easy, considerably cheaper than DCC and much, much more fun.
With DCC operation you will need to leave the last loco being controlled and then enter the address of the point to be moved (if you can remember all those numbers!) press enter then wait a second for the point/s to operate, then return back to the loco originally being controlled or enter an address for another loco etc. During all this time your eye has been taken off the loco/s that are moving. Often with the result that they aren't where you expect them to be or have collided with another one. Of course much money can be spent on pc control with block sections etc. but isn't the joy of the hobby all about running and controlling locos yourself?


My take on this subject is; to each his own. My layout is 20'x10' area and all my points(switches) are operated thru DCC. I even have some street lights, neon building signs operated with DCC. Why? Because I want to and because I can.
I would even op layout shed door with DCC if I could. There is a chap here in Aelaide that has a lift bridge on his garden G scale tram layout operated with his Lenz DCC system. It is the only way to get into his house thru the patio door.
I have been a Lenz user since Aug 95. I can switch any point on layout singularly with hand control from anywhere without having to move to a control panel. The elimination of miles(kilometers) of wire was also a very big attraction. I also had an old laptop(Win 98) set up as central train control which allowed route setting etc., using Zug DCC.
Nov06 I replaced the laptop with an Ecos which allows point control,route setting and a lot more.
I still use my Lenz system connected to sniffer port of Ecos which gives me full walk around etc .
How do I identify each point? Most point motors(Peco) are surface mounted. Getting to old to be crawling around under layouts trying to fit point motors.
Over each p/motor is a small scratch built hut. Each hut is numbered corresponding to DCC accessory number. Those very few p/motors that are attached under layout has post with number on a disc attached adjacent to point. Which means that all points are easy to identify.
The rule on my layout is such that all points must be set before starting train. I have seen many disastrous mishaps occur on DC analogue layouts(control panels) because points were not changed quick enough in front of a moving train.
My main lines are blocked with thru the rails block detection which operate signals which must be obeyed by operaters at all times. My points are slowly being fitted with ground signals to show which line is set.
I use Lenz LS150 accessory decoders which allows op of six(6) points per unit. I have found that operating two points(cross over) wth LS150 is not a problem.
So for me, the more I can operate with DCC the happier I am.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (neil_s_wood @ 17 Oct 2007, 13:56) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hi Ian,

I am using an ECoS too and have also tried using Peco point motors through an LS150. I got pretty poor results so I tried them through an LDT s-dec-dc which is about 50/50. So I am now switching to Tortoise as I get 100% success. Are you using Masterswitch or anything to supplement the LS150 and peco points?

Oh I noticed that the lift bridge thing was very popular in Adelaide. They were very well done.

cheers Neil

Hi Neil, as stated in last post I have no trouble operating Peco points with LS150. Two points in tandem(cross over), no problems.
Lenz suggest max 16v ac to power points. I bit the bullet and tried 18v ac. That was 4yrs ago. Have not destroyed any LS150's yet.
No, I am not using any Masterswitch's or anything to supplement LS150 and Peco points. As they say," it works for me".
The lift bridge on my friends garden tram layout is aprox 4ft long and goes up/down in total horizontal position. It is raised by a 240v motor which drives a chain mechanism each end.
The whole thing is activated by a TCS function only decoder which in turn fires a series of relays which then turns the motors on/off.
Re Ecos, I have not tried shuttle mode yet. Which is the best detector for this?
I am leaning towards the Litfinski.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (neil_s_wood @ 17 Oct 2007, 13:56) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hi Ian,

I am using an ECoS too and have also tried using Peco point motors through an LS150. I got pretty poor results so I tried them through an LDT s-dec-dc which is about 50/50. So I am now switching to Tortoise as I get 100% success. Are you using Masterswitch or anything to supplement the LS150 and peco points?

Oh I noticed that the lift bridge thing was very popular in Adelaide. They were very well done.

cheers Neil

Hi Neil, as stated in last post I have no trouble operating Peco points with LS150. Two points in tandem(cross over), no problems.
Lenz suggest max 16v ac to power points. I bit the bullet and tried 18v ac. That was 4yrs ago. Have not destroyed any LS150's yet.
No, I am not using any Masterswitch's or anything to supplement LS150 and Peco points. As they say," it works for me".
The lift bridge on my friends garden tram layout is aprox 4ft long and goes up/down in total horizontal position. It is raised by a 240v motor which drives a chain mechanism each end.
The whole thing is activated by a TCS function only decoder which in turn fires a series of relays which then turns the motors on/off.
Re Ecos, I have not tried shuttle mode yet. Which is the best detector for this?
I am leaning towards the Litfinski.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (neil_s_wood @ 18 Oct 2007, 08:13) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hi Ian,
as it stands at the moment the LDT is your only option. There are problems with the Veissmann 5233 as it cannot be the last or only one in the chain and the other options are for motorola. The LDT RM-GB-8 is the go, the other LDT one requires reeds. If your interested I put some info on this subject in my blog.

cheers

Neil

Coming back to the control panel thing, I wonder whether having remote point control panels is the go for DCC as it seems that the control panels are an area that is currently missing?

Thanks Neil, the LTD RM-GB-8 is what I was thinking of.
The control panel thing is an interesting subject. Controlling points etc with DCC is something the jury will be out on for some. Others won't have a bar of it and people like me will embrace it and enjoy operating layouts with it.
Re control panel for DCC operated points. The Ecos has already got one. The only thing missing is a track schematic.
I think most programs, RR&CO, Kam Industries have schematics. Even the cheaper Zug DCC program has track schematics that allows operation of points.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (neil_s_wood @ 19 Oct 2007, 07:45) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>No worries Ian,

In regard to the ECoS control panel; what I was thinking was that you could have slave units which had the point control screens which could be connected to the ECoS as remote point operation units as a DCC alternative to the control panel. These could be lower cost as they would not require all the software of the central ECoS unit. Just an idea so that a layout can be operated with many people rather than just one..

Yes, you are right. Slave panels with control screens would be nice.
The way our DCC technology is progressing I would not be surprised to see such units happen in the not to far future.
HappyDCCING
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (Sol @ 18 Oct 2007, 16:51) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ian, while you & I may have some differences in the use of DCC & I accept that you make the best of it especially for modelling modern rail systems, how would you convert a layout that represents a period in time that utilises the traditional signal box that has separate levers for signals & points that are interlocked?

Hi Ron, I would do what others on this thread have suggested. Control my trains with DCC and have separate panels or in this case, separate lever system/s. Interlocking of points is possible with DCC, the levers at this point in time might be a a bit of a trick.
Who knows somewhere down the track (pun intended) some tech boffins might find a way to incorporate a lever system in DCC.
HappyDCCing or in your case Ron,
Happy Direct Current Control.
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (neil_s_wood @ 23 Oct 2007, 08:11) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>To a very limited degree that is true but only in the sense that a beginner may not instal them correctly.

I have found that even Peco point motors controlled by DCC which once worked well will suddenly not work well five minutes later for no apparent reason. They are very tempramental and unreliable with DCC without a supplementary device. A lot of the time they twitch rather than switch.

If it is "really down to the ability of the person installing the point motors", as you allege, then please explain the existence of Master switch, CDU's and Peco's Microswitch to supplement the peco point motor? Why would they be neccessary then if it was purely down to the ability of the installer? If this was true there would be no market for rectification products. As Brian says once you have reached the cost of adding masterswitch or microswitch then you would be as well getting a Tortoise or Tillig motor which are 100% reliable (well they are for me).

30 yrs in model railroading and I have only used standard Peco points and point motors.
I have not used CDU's even when I was DC Analogue. (13yrs ago).
Things I learnt early days with Peco point motors; Do not use DC voltage, use minimum 16v if not using DCC , a small drop of Wahl (hair clipper) oil or similar every 6 mnths or so on point cross bar and point motor helps.
As stated in earlier posts I now op all points thru DCC with Lenz LS150 accessory decoders.
Although Lenz say max 16v ac I put 18/19v ac 5amp into my LS150's. Have been doing this over 4yrs without any detrimental effect on any LS 150's. Have not cooked one yet.
I have no trouble firing two point motors in tandem such as cross overs. Some point motors have micro switches, some have cheap Peco two way switches, all fire 99%.
I do not believe that anything works 100% all of the time. I am a member of a DCC model Rail way club and the club layout has a number of Tortois motors fitted and the odd one jams occasionally, not very often, but it does happen .
Re CDU's, Masterswitch's and the like. Very good products, specially the Masterswitch. I believe the producers saw an opening in the market for such products and, yes there is but IMHO not absolutely necessary. I have seen CDU's/Masterswitches fail too.
IMO, peco points do have to be installed properly. In My case more so because most of my point motors are surface mounted with rods and mechanisms etc. Reasonable gauge wire is a must so there is no voltage drop.
Also, Peco p/motors should have between 4-5 ohm resistance on each coil. Under 4 ohm is risky, 3 ohms is near a dead short which,as we know, is big trouble. I have known the odd new Peco p/motror to be under 4 0hms. Not often but has been known. We all know the odd failure happens in any product that is mass produced.
Re the cost of Peco point motor plus micro switches etc., being the same or close to slow motion motors with everything included. True, but, I don't require switches on all my point
motors therefore, I would be paying for something I don't want in many cases.
As I use all insulfrog points I do not require power routed frogs.No, I do not have stalling problems at the frogs either but that is another subject.
As they say,it works for me and after all, is that not what this wonderful hobby is all about. There is often no correct way just the way that works best for you.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (Sol @ 23 Oct 2007, 13:59) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Ian, while you have minimal problems with Peco motors & it is true that turnouts ( as Peco calls them) need to be installed properly, you indicate that you do not have switches on the motors.
OK, no panels therefore no indicating lights to determine which way the turnout has thrown - I presume then that you can see all turnouts easily? Or does your DCC system indicate to you that the turnout blades have moved? Peco motor with accessory switch is a 99% certainty to indicate that the blades have moved. Tortoise motor contacts only indicate that the motor has moved but not the blades - I had that problem due to the tiebar sticking, fixed now of course

Paragraph 3 of my post states that I do have switches on some P/motors for signaling and they operate OK. I will be fitting more switches as time and finance dept (petticoat government) permits. The signals show which route has been selected as well as adding to overal look of layout.
Re being able to see points, that is the beauty of operating points thru DCC. Most times the points are changed by DCC hand control in the area of point, specialy shunting in yards.
This,of course,changes when setting routes, I can not see my whole layout from Ecos panel but my ear is well tuned to a changing Peco point. Hopefully with accessory switches fitted to p/motors feed back into Ecos screen will be available in near future.
The screen on Ecos has icons for each point and route which shows direction the point has changed but that at the moment is only at system end.
It is only when operating on my own that things are sometimes in lap of model railway gods.Must admit, very little problem so far.

Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (dbclass50 @ 23 Oct 2007, 17:07) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>IMHO there are two camps as regards point actuation, those that use solenoid devices & those that use motorised devices.

Ian says that he has used Peco points & motors for over 30 years with no problems, so he must have some equipment that is very old - I have an theory that its just possible that the tooling is now past its sell by date.
For example the Peco points on the "public" side of SL are some 20 years old & had been reused about 5 times by the original builder. They were actuated by Peco motors under the points & worked with a high degree of reliability - they were changed for Fulgurex because of the cost comparison when you allow for the extra switching required.
The storage yard was constructed using new Peco points, motors & track. Although very carefully installed we only managed around 90% reliability which is no good at all for automated loops. We tried using H & M point motors (they were brand new) & although the reliability was better we still had problems with the points themselves which made us think that there is some problem with the points themselves. We tried a variety of voltages from 12 - 24v DC & AC & a CDU fitted with extra caps.
All the points, motors & track on the storage yard has now been replaced by FLM profi & works with almost 100% reliability BTW when the FLM point motors actuate you hear a descrete click, not a clunk or a buzz.

Our experience is that older Peco points are fine, but later ones are not - does anyone else have any similar experiences ?

Regarding the reliability of the Fulgurex motors we had a test jig set up in the workshop using some automation which ran for 24/7 (Rocoline trackwork/Fulgurex motors) - it was 100% reliable over some 250,000 cycles plus.

You don't say exactly what the trouble you experienced with the Peco points. I presume the points stick and do not activate properly.
You say you changed p/motors and still had trouble which,as you say, points(whoops pun) to the points being the problem more than the motor.
You say newer Peco points give problems. This I do agree with as I have experienced new Peco points sticking. Not often, only the odd one. It is usually the tie (throw) bar sticking. A little bit of work soon fixes it.
RE age of my points and p/motors; some are 10yrs old up to 6months.
Always check resistance in each coil with DVM. If under 4 ohms chances are P/mototor will give trouble when activated. 3 ohms or lower will usually let the magic smoke out. If being operated with DCC the overload in accessory decoder will shut down. Resistance should be closer to 5 ohms in each coil.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 

· Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
QUOTE (dbclass50 @ 24 Oct 2007, 16:59) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hi Ian,

Yes, I should I said what the problem was - it was the points themselves sticking, sometimes the tie bar & sometimes the contacts fouling the underside of the rail. The H & M's worked OK, but I felt that the points and/or linkage would give before the motors !
Personally, I don't think that you should have to work on new products to make them work - certainly not with the ratio I had (about 12 out of 16), maybe I just had a bad batch, although they were a mixture of hands & radius.

I agree re not having to work on new products but sometimes thats the way things are. We pull our loco's to pieces to fit a decoder for DCC. I don't see much difference really.
The small amount of fiddling it takes to fix a peco point is not really a problem for me. The lower cost of Peco points is also a decider for me.
Happy DCCing
Iansa
 
1 - 10 of 48 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top