I love the magazine and still find more of interest in any given issue than the other publications BUT I do notice a tad bias towards steam layouts.
Could you include more D & E layouts considering that they cover a substantial time period (1955 to present) and, judging by exhibitions of late, constitute a large percentage of the railway modelling population's interest?
So far you've only included two exclusively D & E layouts (Dewsbury Midland and Combwich) and all other D & E traction has been in transition period layouts.
I'm sure I'm not the only reader whose noticed this apparent omission.
Just a small criticism of an otherwise exceelent magazine.
Could you include more D & E layouts considering that they cover a substantial time period (1955 to present) and, judging by exhibitions of late, constitute a large percentage of the railway modelling population's interest?
So far you've only included two exclusively D & E layouts (Dewsbury Midland and Combwich) and all other D & E traction has been in transition period layouts.
I'm sure I'm not the only reader whose noticed this apparent omission.
Just a small criticism of an otherwise exceelent magazine.