QUOTE Generally, we find that some of the smaller shows are more cost effective - many of the other smaller traders we talk to tend to agree. Maybe, the days of the big prestige shows are drawing to a close ?
It depends where you're coming from.
From the point of view of the smaller trader, quite possibly. I'm not sure that the circle can be squared as far as small traders costs /revenue for doing big shows. A moderate volume/low cost show may well be a much more cost effective way for the trader to go than a high volume/high cost exercise, especially now there is also the internet to generate on-line orders. Much more enjoyable too perhaps
But I don't think the big shows are doomed without small traders. Attendences at the really big shows and the next tier down seem generally to be rising slowly but steadily. Warley hit a new record gate last December, York's gate is holding up or growing I believe, and I understand Alexandra Palace in 2006 was about 20% up on attendance Warners first London show , and from what I can gather between a third and a half higher than the gate in the dying years of IMREX. Harrogate is down a bit but that seems to be more due to the change of venue . Nottingham allegedly could do with a bigger venue. Shows like Spalding and Railex Aylesbury seem to be doing pretty well in the next bracket down.
And I'm sure this isn't an issue at the specialist shows like Scaleforum, ExpoEM, or DEMU Showcase
None of these shows look like they are going to keel over to me - so long as they don't lose their venue (Chatham being a case in point). In fact I remember a discussion on another forum where quite a lot of people suggested they preferred to pay £5 or £6 to see a larger show rather than spend an hour or two at a small show. I've heard the suggestion from one or two sources that these kind of shows might be feeling the draft a bit , though I've not heard any direct evidence whether this is true
Big shows with few specialist small traders may be a less rich experience but I don't think that means the big shows will fade away or fold
It depends where you're coming from.
From the point of view of the smaller trader, quite possibly. I'm not sure that the circle can be squared as far as small traders costs /revenue for doing big shows. A moderate volume/low cost show may well be a much more cost effective way for the trader to go than a high volume/high cost exercise, especially now there is also the internet to generate on-line orders. Much more enjoyable too perhaps
But I don't think the big shows are doomed without small traders. Attendences at the really big shows and the next tier down seem generally to be rising slowly but steadily. Warley hit a new record gate last December, York's gate is holding up or growing I believe, and I understand Alexandra Palace in 2006 was about 20% up on attendance Warners first London show , and from what I can gather between a third and a half higher than the gate in the dying years of IMREX. Harrogate is down a bit but that seems to be more due to the change of venue . Nottingham allegedly could do with a bigger venue. Shows like Spalding and Railex Aylesbury seem to be doing pretty well in the next bracket down.
And I'm sure this isn't an issue at the specialist shows like Scaleforum, ExpoEM, or DEMU Showcase
None of these shows look like they are going to keel over to me - so long as they don't lose their venue (Chatham being a case in point). In fact I remember a discussion on another forum where quite a lot of people suggested they preferred to pay £5 or £6 to see a larger show rather than spend an hour or two at a small show. I've heard the suggestion from one or two sources that these kind of shows might be feeling the draft a bit , though I've not heard any direct evidence whether this is true
Big shows with few specialist small traders may be a less rich experience but I don't think that means the big shows will fade away or fold