Joined
·
2,783 Posts
QUOTE QUOTE(hoarp001 @ 4 Sep 2007, 22:29)
Hi,
Its not the setting the ballast that I find hard, its arranging it all to look nice and neat. I know in reality its not perfect, but it just looks odd unless its really straight.
Although i have found a way of making this abit easier... I went to B and Q and bought a .7m long brushed draught exclduer. Im sure you know the type, its just a long continuous brush. I used this to sweep a line of ballast up to the track and get a nice straight edge. After that I used a little brush to get it in between the sleeprs etc. I have a 6 inch bit setting now so hoepfuly it will look ok..
Thanks.
I think this is a good example of the 'rushing' I mentioned in a previous message. People consider ballasting a necessary 'evil' and look for ways to speed up the process, often by using tools which are like sledge hammers to put a pin in ir far too big for the job.
The bottom line is that if you want ballast to look good, you have to use one of the traditional methods and take the TIME and CARE doing it. If you rush it, you won't get the results you're looking for.
Using the method I described on the MROL website, I can ballast one foot of both tracks of a twin track line in about an hour.
With regards to the 'perfect' appearance of prototype track, it depends on what era you are modelling. In UK steam days, 'length gangs' were responsible for the maintenence of specific lengths of track including the tidyness of ballast. With timber sleepers, it was necessary to ensure that they were not busried in ballast as this would cause rot and significantly reduce the lifetime of a sleeper. As a result, the appearance was normally very tidy.
In modern times, ballasting is done by machine and tamping, sleepers are concrete and 'length gangs' are no more. It doesn't matter whether concrete is burried in ballast, but the machinery usually ensures a tidy edge (know as a 'shoulder') to the ballast.
I find that the small flat brush shown in the pictures on http://www.mrol.com.au/ballasting.aspx is an ideal tool and enables me to do the job fairly quickly. The pictures show the results for themselves.
Graham Plowman
Hi,
Its not the setting the ballast that I find hard, its arranging it all to look nice and neat. I know in reality its not perfect, but it just looks odd unless its really straight.
Although i have found a way of making this abit easier... I went to B and Q and bought a .7m long brushed draught exclduer. Im sure you know the type, its just a long continuous brush. I used this to sweep a line of ballast up to the track and get a nice straight edge. After that I used a little brush to get it in between the sleeprs etc. I have a 6 inch bit setting now so hoepfuly it will look ok..
Thanks.
I think this is a good example of the 'rushing' I mentioned in a previous message. People consider ballasting a necessary 'evil' and look for ways to speed up the process, often by using tools which are like sledge hammers to put a pin in ir far too big for the job.
The bottom line is that if you want ballast to look good, you have to use one of the traditional methods and take the TIME and CARE doing it. If you rush it, you won't get the results you're looking for.
Using the method I described on the MROL website, I can ballast one foot of both tracks of a twin track line in about an hour.
With regards to the 'perfect' appearance of prototype track, it depends on what era you are modelling. In UK steam days, 'length gangs' were responsible for the maintenence of specific lengths of track including the tidyness of ballast. With timber sleepers, it was necessary to ensure that they were not busried in ballast as this would cause rot and significantly reduce the lifetime of a sleeper. As a result, the appearance was normally very tidy.
In modern times, ballasting is done by machine and tamping, sleepers are concrete and 'length gangs' are no more. It doesn't matter whether concrete is burried in ballast, but the machinery usually ensures a tidy edge (know as a 'shoulder') to the ballast.
I find that the small flat brush shown in the pictures on http://www.mrol.com.au/ballasting.aspx is an ideal tool and enables me to do the job fairly quickly. The pictures show the results for themselves.
Graham Plowman