Model Railway Forum banner
1 - 3 of 7 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
40 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I recently ran by the idea of a railroad past my folks and to my surprise, they did not veto the idea of getting rid of an ancient sofa in the corner of our lower living room. If done, this would liberate an L-space along two walls approximately 230 cm on one side and 350 cm on the other. (7' 6" and 11' 4", respectively)

I got to thinking. What sort of layouts would you do with that kind of dimensions? continuous running is a must, but mind you, my prototype would be European, so it doesn't need to fit US mainline traffic. Both the ends of the L would be accessible from two sides, so a dogbone with large-radius ends would be one possibility.

Loco-wise, I want to be able to run European diesels and steamers from 1930s to 1980s (NEM eras II to IV), wheel orders up to approx. 4-8-2 and C-C (most of them about a foot long, max). I wouldn't mind running the occasional American diesel, probably nothing much bigger than a GP38. I do own a DD40X, but don't expect to ever have either the broad curves for it, or an appropriate string of freight.

Prototype-wise, I've half a mind to forego historical accuracy altogether, running whatever locos from whatever eras I like, mostly because being a stickler for detail does nothing to enhance my enjoyment for running trains. Besides, I could still "realistically" run freights to industries just the same, it'd just mean that occasionally a TGV would have to wait until the BR52 clears the platform.

So, how would you fill the available space? I'm fairly stumped because programs like XTrkCAD tend to have really horrible user-interfaces and as such, are exremely hard to use.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
40 Posts
Thanks for the book hints, I'm sure they'll prove useful. I've gotten some nice ideas from a few other forums, and a lot of useless advice, such as a few Americans thinking the space is too small for anything but a switching layout (the more I do the math, the more it seems they're right, but it's still rather unhelpful). One person additionally suggested I could make the world's neatest Z-scale layout in that space...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
40 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Consider that such a piece would have to be as big as the layout itself, essentially a second L-shape to complete the rectangle. Completely unfeasible, hard to make and fiendishly hard to secure.

I'm determined, though, that I'd rather buy a bloody pool table than make a switching layout, so I guess I'll wait around until a better opportunity presents itself, like in 2-5 years when I move out.
 
1 - 3 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top