Further to a discussion elsewhere about the merits of diecast and injection moulding lets continue the discusion here.
The images below are from Model Rail Forum reviews of a Trix diecast loco and a Hornby injection moulded loco:-
How do we think the two compare for sharpness/crispness of detail?
I am looking at the boiler door hinges and the general texture of the surface finishes.
Another image showing detail on a Hornby injection moulded model:-
And a Brawa diecast model:-
There is a capiliary effect around the edges and rims of the moulded diecast detail that is not present with the injection moulded examples where the main surface retains its flatness right to the edge of any contour change. The lighting is intense and probably exagerates any issues if there are any.
Which looks the more natural?
Happy modelling
Gary
The images below are from Model Rail Forum reviews of a Trix diecast loco and a Hornby injection moulded loco:-


How do we think the two compare for sharpness/crispness of detail?
I am looking at the boiler door hinges and the general texture of the surface finishes.
Another image showing detail on a Hornby injection moulded model:-

And a Brawa diecast model:-

There is a capiliary effect around the edges and rims of the moulded diecast detail that is not present with the injection moulded examples where the main surface retains its flatness right to the edge of any contour change. The lighting is intense and probably exagerates any issues if there are any.
Which looks the more natural?
Happy modelling
Gary