Model Railway Forum banner
41 - 48 of 48 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
107 Posts
QUOTE (Nozomi @ 16 Jan 2008, 00:54) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I think so.I will give it a go when I get my Maunsels.
I don't know how the corridor door treatments are done yet.
With the Hornby Pullmans and Gresleys I removed the corridor end doors except for first coach next to loco and last coach.
This was because there were detail pieces which could bind and cause derailments while running.
As the was some daylight when coupled as so with the Pullmans I made rubbing plates of black cardboard [thin] to replace the end doors with a bit a concertina style folded black paper to hold in place.
I rubbed black graphite powder on the plates which makes them very slippery.
The Gresleys did not need anything.

It is all trial and error I'm afraid,

Cheers,
Bryan.

Received the SR Maunsells today.


They are very,very nice.The best I've seen in the ready to run UK offerings.
Worth the wait.

The provided Roco type coupling still leave quite a gap.
All is not lost as these will be good for Bachmann coaching stock coupling replacements.

I used the Austrian Roco couplers with closer tolerances.

The corridor connection doors/covers have to be removed when using Austrian Roco couplers.The doors can be left on the first and last coach ends.
Save them with the packing plastic in suitable mini plastic bags.
Just slip a single sided safety razor blade in between the door and the main corridor connection vertical side and the door/cover will pop out.
You will see detail of the main coach door behind it when you remove it.

The coaches have to be firmly "banged" together to allow the Roco couplers to latch.A small price to pay to get more close coupling realism.
They were after all,designed for use on Roco rolling stock.
This gives a good close coupling with minimal daylight between the corridor connections.
The buffers do not quite touch like the Pullmans and Gresley stock but the total effect is pleasing anyway.
No problems running behind the SR M7.
The CCM [close coupling mechanism] work perfectly as they were intended and should do.

Cheers,
Bryan.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
37 Posts
Discussion Starter · #42 ·
QUOTE (Nozomi @ 6 Feb 2008, 09:18) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Received the SR Maunsells today.


I used the Austrian Roco couplers with closer tolerances.

Cheers,
Bryan.

Bryan,

Could you please tell me the product number so I can make sure I get the right ones,

Tar
Darren
 

· Registered
Joined
·
107 Posts
QUOTE (Daz @ 6 Feb 2008, 00:46) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Bryan,

Could you please tell me the product number so I can make sure I get the right ones,

Tar
Darren

Darren,

Per Roco catalogue description.

"Close coupling devises with delayed uncoupling for standard coupling pockets according to NEM 362.

#40270 4 units per pack".

"#40271 same as 40270 but Economy package with 50 units".

They look like the Hornby ones and the Roco ones plug into the NEM pocket further thus giving closer coupling.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Bryan.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,687 Posts
Confirming what has been said before (I'm a latecomer to this thread): the Maunsell coaches could be seen behind V2s, B1s and Britannias when the Merchant Navies were temporarily withdrawn in the '50s. They can legitimately be used with class 24s, 33s and also 22 Diesel-hydraulics on the "Withered Arm" - I have a pic of one with a two-set heading towards Wadebridge to prove it!

Regarding couplings: as some others have also advised, I remove the gangway covers within the set, and have used Kaydee no. 18 couplers which work perfectly for me, both pulling and pushing. In the meantime, I also discovered that the Hornby close couplers work a treat with the Bachmann mark 1s and they are so much more convenient than the Bachmann rigid "pipe" couplers.

I'm just waiting for one more brake 2nd to be delivered so I can complete my three-set plus loose coaches. In the meantime I have substituted an older Ian Kirk brake coach which has nowhere near the exquisite detail and finish of the Hornby ones.
 

· Administrator
Joined
·
10,744 Posts
QUOTE the Maunsell coaches could be seen behind ....

Did these coaches ever "escape" to other parts of the country on inter regional expresses, say Bournemouth to Leeds / York / Newcastle? I would be glad of an excuse for a set appearing in the West Riding. Most photographs taken in the 50s are focussed on the locomotive, not the train. I am not expert enough to tell if the coaches are not standard ER fare or not.

David
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
I'm sure that there was an article on one of the inter Regional trains via the GC in BRM a few years back (from the Shipley club in connection with their Leicester S Goods project). As far as I can remember there were two sets of stock , one provided by the ER and one by the SReg. The article might indicate what was in the SReg set
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,507 Posts
Details of coach sets on the Southern can be found here:

http://www.semgonline.com/coach/sets.html

In fact, if you are interested in the Southern then I would suggest joining this free email group.

The Southern had many through services to other parts of the UK - and still does. Brighton/Bournemouth to Manchester and Newcastle, Portsmouth to Cardiff, and even Exmouth to Cleethorpes in the 1950s via the S&D. These services often used SR stock so is a good excuse to use the Maunsell coaches on other regions. And of course in the summer holiday season there were numerous specials, often using Maunsell stock when this had been displaced by MK1s on the premium services. I saw a photo recently of a rake of Maunsell coaches on the Great Central behind a 9F ....

The SEMG document not only lists the coaches in the sets (with set numbers) but also their principle area of use, including inter-regional.
 
41 - 48 of 48 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top