Model Railway Forum banner
1 - 9 of 65 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
I suspect the Sapphire will be developed "in-house" (and thoroughly tested before release).

Why on earth would Lenz allow Hornby to rebadge their top of the line decoder and sell it for less than Lenz's own price for the Gold? Whatever Lenz stand for in DCC , it isn't discount prices. Anyway Lenz have ties to Roco and Bachmann

Digitrax are tied up with ZTC (and Gaugemaster????) . ESU are taken by Bachmann. That leaves TCS (who don't do Back EMF decoders and whose decoders may have issues with the Select) , NCE , and now I'm struggling

And anyway I'm still doubtful that any of the existing players in DCC have any interest in seeing a mass market company like Hornby selling anything other than severely crippled and limited DCC equipment

Hornby isn't big by the standards of Ford, Microsoft or Vodaphone but its very big compared to the likes of Lenz, ESU or NCE, and the little fish don't want to see the pike get into their pond

Thew 2 parts of Hornby's announcement seem to go together: the current Hornby decoder isn't sufficent to be accepted by existing DCC users, so they'll keep the DCC Ready option on all locos for another year or two till the Sapphire is ready. DCC Fitted locos will use the decoder they've actually got pro tem
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
I don't see Hornby being a big player - at this stage - in the German market. Their only real German brand is Arnold, and I don't really see N gauge as ripe for DCC yet in the way HO and OO are. They have bought a bridgehead in Germany, no more

But they are a big player in Western Europe, with the leading brands in the UK (probably) France, Spain and Italy. They may not be up with Maerklin, and Fleischmann, but they are certainly in the next bracket, and much bigger than companies like Piko or Mehano . And unlike a number of the big Continental players, Hornby are profitable, financially strong, and have a low cost production base b- none of which appliex to Maerklin, Roco or the late unlamented Groupe Riva'

Most of the reasons why I don't believe Lenz , ESU et al would speak to Hornby have been given by other posters:

QUOTE They make very different products. Hornby make budget toy trains. ESU, Lenz make electronics. While Hornby may produce budget DCC systems this is not the area catered for by Lenz or ESU who do quality middle and top end products. They are competing in different areas. Remember Hornby is only big or known in the UK and to a limited extent in it's former colonies.

That , I suspect will be Lenz's (or ESU's) view of Hornby - a bunch of hicks from some wet rocks off the coast of Europe who knock out a few toys and have accidently bought the wreck of a second string Continental operator without any real understanding of how the business works in the real world.

The whole idea of lower prices and competition to build volume sales flies in the face of the whole business strategy of the German market for a decade or more. If Hornby say they are trying to offer affordable DCC to open up the mass market, anyone in the German market will just roll their eyes in incomprehension . Anyway German modellers are very nationalistic. If its German it must be good ,and we buy it. If its not German it must be poor quality, and we won't buy it. This explains the persistance of obsolete 3 rail AC , rejected everywhere else decades ago, and the way manufacturers like Maerklin continue to issue coaches that are not to scale length so they can go round trainset curves - something discredited in the UK 40 years ago

Its a seriously skewed view. Meccano had that view of Triang in the 50s. But some Continentals can be very dismissive (and fairly ignorant) of Britain

QUOTE They will have to go some to crack the european (especially German) markets. The european modeller is so totally different from his/her UK counterpart. Why do you think Marklin (stud contact AC) is so strong in europe ?

I'm sure they will have a tough job, but I remember all the discussion on German and Austrian manufacturers pricing themselves out of business.
Haven't we seen quite a few companies going bancrupt or near bancrupt in the last year?
There seems to be an opening for a canny operator there?

France is fertile ground for this. The French HO market has been hit hard by the loss of a lot of key items which were in the Jouef and Roco ranges. Hornby have already made some friends by offering reintroduced Jouef at prices noticeably lower than before. "La retour de Jouef democratique!" as one loco revue forum poster put it. The French are clearly chafing under the high price regime - "miseramodelisme" or modelling on a budget seems to be a popular cause. French prices are further affected because all German brands have to be supplied via an importer, leading to a 25% mark up on shop prices just across the Rhine

QUOTE I still think companies like Lenz have something to worry about if and when mass market companies like Hornby start offering Locos fitted with decoders equivellent to the Silver or Gold.
At the moment Hornby have stumbled in with "dodgy" budget kit, but this will change, as we see better spec items appearing.
Similarly if some of their separately available decoders can offer this type of quality but at a lower price, then the established companies will have a problem. Add to that "market presence", i.e. Brand names available at virtually every model rail outlet and many toy shops, as opposed to limited dealers and availability.

Moving further up-market for the likes of Lenz will only reduce their market share and make them niche players; well more so than now!

I agree with this. And I don't think any of the established Continental DCC players will be willing to make serious technology available to Hornby for these reasons. Why give Hornby the tools to do the job. I reckon the thinking will be "Don't break ranks and do anything silly, chaps. Just ignore them and they'll be no danger"

For Lenz the UK must look like a tiny unimportant market. Given the low pentration of DCC here,DCC sales volume must be less than 5% of Germany . What do German manufacturers care about the UK market? Look at the way Marklin couldn't be bothered reintroducing British Minitrex? Ever seen Maerklin or Roco or Lenz or ESU at Warley? (Heljan have a big stand and so do Digitrax)

And Lenz do not seem interested in the mass market,. Theior preferred strategy seems to be to wholesale the cheaper end of the market through a RTR manufacturer (Roco or Bachmann) and limit their own brand to the higher end products. Until very recently they've never kept an obsolete decoder in the range as a budget option (unlike TCS)

Lenz just don't have a sales network to sell to a mass market. Never mind whether they could get the product made in volume- they're not geared to market those sort of volumes

QUOTE They will but while Hornby are catching up the market leaders Lenz, ESU, Zimo and Viessmann will be making new advances and rasing the hurdles higher.

Think of Lenz , ESU Zimo and Viessmann as makers of high end hifi gear - espcially Zimo. This is trhe world of the £1000 cd player or £5000 plasma screens. Hornby want to be Richer Sounds (for non UK members a aggressive chain of small shops selling budget hifi and home cinema separates. Infinitely better than a supermarket DVD player, and now only £79.99!!!!)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
dwb:

No offence meant to Mackays - just noting that some overseas companies, who are clearly interested in the UK, make the effort to have a direct presence . Others don't.

Flieschmann have had a big layout at some UK shows to fly the flag. Marklin - don't, and have never been seen here. The fact Marklin don't, that they couldn't be bothered to reintroduce the Minitrix range , and that when Z-club GB got them to do a Z gauge 47, Marklin couldn't even be bothered to advertise the fact in the UK , let alone market it, does suggest they have no interest in the UK market

Zimo have only just got a UK agent , and the fact that I know nothing about Veisseman speaks volumes for their UK presence

I think Digitrax have been a sponser at Warley for two years (My personal take on this is that they're wondering why one of the worlds 2 leading DCC brands is almost invisible here and trying to do something about it)

But I do agree - Lenz really need to do something about their systems , and above all the obsolete Compact. What really strikes me is that they've already developed an excellent replacement for the Compact - but they've given it to Roco to sell in trainsets, rather than sell it themselves

If they don't announce a replacement for the Compact at this Nuremburg Fair , or the very latest at the next, then I think you may be right about them opting out.

Just out of interest - how old is Bernhard Lenz now?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
It seems from comment elsewhere that - despite my argument this wouldn't happen - the Sapphire is a top line Lenz decoder, either the Gold or something new and comparable

Those with Continental interests may wish to flag this up for "Nuremburg watchlists" , in case this is a hint Lenz have a slate of new products to announce this year
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
Quite apart from anything else , copy dates don't allow. The embargo came off on 1st Jan - by that time the Feb issues (due out around 14-20 days later) would be at the printers

The mags won't comment till at least next month
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
QUOTE I don't think anyone who either runs a British outline magazine or a forum which focuses on British outline can dare alienate Hornby as they are responsible for such a large chunk of the UK market.

Rail Express have "difficult" relationships with Bachmann, and have used the editorial column and reviews to make their point - I think one editorial claimed they had forced Bachmann to retool the 37. They and others have been pretty critical of Heljan too. There's nothing to criticise on the Hornby 60 or 08, and REx doesn't do steam

Modern Railway Modelling employed the author of "electricnose" as lead reviewer for some time. He's hardly known as an apologist for the manufacturers....

Model Railway Journal doesn't depend on RTR at all. Mind you their target audience is only now hearing that DCC exists... I bet MRJ never even mentions the existance of either Select or Elite.

As for people owning forums not daring to alienate the manufacturers - don't you believe it!. The author of the "electricnose" site was also owner/moderator of most of the specialist modern image Yahoo groups of the last 6-7 years. They were hardly pro Hornby or Bachmann or Heljan - their reputation from outside has always been as no-holds barred rivet-counter fests and I doubt if a poster supportive of the manufacturers would have survived too long on those boards

Bachmann is pretty well as big as Hornby in terms of British outline : remembering Bachmann have N gauge as well as OO. In fact in the modern image sector , Bachmann's much bigger - Hornby have only made a relatively limited push in this area, after virtually leaving diesels to Bachmann and Lima in the 90s. Hornby have not tooled up a new DMU /EMU since the Eurostar and before that the Pacer around 1990 (their 101, 121, 155, and 156 were inherited tooling from Dapol and Lima) . Bachmann have done 158, 166, 170, 220/221 , just released a superb 108 and are/were promising 150

It is in the "diesel and electric" sector, principally in 4mm, that the fur has flown , and inevitably the manufacturers who are heavily exposed to that sector - Bachmann and Heljan - have taken the brunt . Hornby have tended to focus more on steam, where comment remains gentlemanly

Result - relations between the specialist D+E magazines , societies , and websites and Bachmann have effectively broken down. Hence Bachmanngate last summer

Personally I think that the rivet-counting in diesel and electric has got out of hand ,and that the flamethrower and the vitriol bottle are not instruments of persuasion . The best new releases have taken an unprecedented torrent of criticism over a 5 year period, which has poisoned the atmosphere , and now the investment in new tooling for this sector is drying up.

Why is Dennis Lovett describing the 150 project as "not dropped" and poking fun at rivet counters? Why did Simon Kohler go out of his way to say the Pendolino was aimed at the trainset market not scale modellers ?

I'm afraid, living as I do in the bombed out rubble created by the War against the Manufacturers in 4mm D+E, I'm not up for a new campaign against another manufacturer...

But as far as magazines criticising Hornby - lets see what Rail Express and MRM say about the Pendolino . Personally I think it opens up a lot of ground for modelling and we're lucky to get it at all

I would imagine the magazines will wait for feedback from their readers before taking any stance on DCC Fitted . Watch the letters pages - though Hornby may have spiked their guns.

RM indicated they would do an in depth review of the Select next month, once they had had time to test it.

I think the posting on etiquette is in Station Concourse
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
Just as a postscript , BRM have in fact posted a news item dated 24/1/07 on their website (brmodelling.com), reporting Hornby's U-turn and welcoming it as good news

The third paragraph in particular is quite vigourously worded, and might be taken as passing comment on the current Bachmann 21 pin situation as well

The Feb issue of BRM was already on the news stands when this went up on the website- I suspect we will see something in print in the March , or more probably April, issue of BRM (March is probably already at the printers)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
There are a few comments on Hornby and its DCC products in Phil Graingers regular DCC article in Model Rail this month.

Basically , he's got hold of 2 Select units . TCS decoders won't run on one - but will on the other (has someone managed to sort out the signal distortion on later production batches??)

He also indicates that Hornby were a bit unhappy about his previous review which stated that functions 5-8 were not working. Having put his "new toy" signal analyser on the Select , it seems the signal being sent for these functions by the Select is plain incorrect - hence they won't work

One retailer is advertising that they regard the warranty on any TCS decoder as null and void if it is run on a layout controlled by any Hornby DCC unit. This seems somewhat over the top - I've not seen any suggestion that TCS decoders are damaged in any way , simply that they can't recognise the signal with that level of distortion in it (see the "ring ring" thread)

However the Hornby decoder is another story , and the Model Rail article, while regretting the limited number of CV's supported, specifically praises the actual smoothness of running and performance at the rail. They do not make any suggestion that it is incompatible with other DCC systems - I'm not sure what system the reviewer normally uses , but as he is an established DCC user ,it won't have been the Select
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
It one thing saying "if it doesn't work on the layout because of incompatibilty/signal distortion, don't blame us".

It's another thing voiding the warranty - ie completely walking away from the goods - if someone has placed the loco on a layout hooked up to a Select for 5 minutes

If the decoder breaks for other reasons , at a later stage, disclaiming the warranty because the loco once ran on a layout controlled by a Select seems to me unreasonable
 
1 - 9 of 65 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top