Model Railway Forum banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
116 Posts
Returning to the original questions, I would say that the PL10W is preferable. The Bromsgrove Models website recommends it over the standard version for use with the NCE Snapit; this is presumably based on practical experience. In principle there seems little point in using a device with an extremely high current consumption when something less demanding is available. There are some people who have claimed that the W version does not have adequate power, but that is not my experience. I have a number in use and they work well. I suggest that you buy one and try it out for yourself.

I can't say if the SEEP is preferable. The 2 makes have their adherents. I tried a SEEP, but at an early stage the board on which the components are mounted split in 2, so I have bought no more.

I agree with other contributors that you might do better with something different. I am gradually converting to a variety of motor drives. I have tried various (Tortoise, Fulgurex, Schuhmacher, Tillig) and find the Tortoise easiest to fit, though because of its size you need a fairly deep baseboard. The Peco and SEEP devices are both pretty crude. By the time you have added the PL15 microswitches to the Peco, which cost more than the motor (the long term reliability of the PL13 switch is generally considered dubious), it is not even cheap. Also using an individual decoder for each point will work out very expensive. NCE do a decoder for Tortoises that controls 2 points for the same money and one that controls 8 at not much more than a third of the cost per point.
 
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top