I found the Hornby Dublo Supplement included with the latest issue of Horby Magazine dull and boring. Michael Shaw added nothing to Pat Hammond's material and then some of it was repeated for a third time in Under the Hammer. There was nothing original in any of it so I am not sure where all this "research" fitted in. It is called 70 years but there is nothing after 1966!!
Given it is Hornby magazine one would have thought it could have done a better job than the other magazines and would have included some genuinely interesting and unique archive material. I am sure if Pat Hammond had been given the whole supplement it might have achieved this.
To end on a postive note the Hornby Magazine itself continues to be an excellent read

Given it is Hornby magazine one would have thought it could have done a better job than the other magazines and would have included some genuinely interesting and unique archive material. I am sure if Pat Hammond had been given the whole supplement it might have achieved this.

To end on a postive note the Hornby Magazine itself continues to be an excellent read
