QUOTE (Brossard @ 25 Oct 2011, 13:38)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Let's be clear - there's tender drive where you have a pancake type motor in the tender and the loco is pushed by the tender and then there's the motor in the tender driving a gearbox in the loco. The latter case, I think, is the best of both worlds although I haven't done any. I have a great deal of experience with the former having started British modelling in the mid-80s - very little of it good (IMO). (Some models had pancake motors in the loco - these were no better).
I think I agree with Brian and would clarify that my definition of performance is the ability of the loco to move at a scale 5mph continuously -
can the pancake motor design do that? With the ability of good quality decoders to adjust performance I wait to be convinced.
I'm fairly ruthless with my locomotives. If a particular loco doesn't perform to my liking - out it goes to be replaced with one that does. My collection is fairly small as a result.
John
Hi John,
Yes, pancake motors as per Fleischmann can indeed. Unfortunately, the el-cheapo versions by some other manufactures has effectively rubbished the pancake motor's reputation, no matter how good they can be.
I suppose the ideal performer would be to have a die-cast chassis & body with (flexible) plastic detail (both locomotive & tender), room in the smokebox for a speaker, can motor with big flywheel in tender driving the locomotive itself via a low mounted inconspicuous driveshaft, not forgetting an easyfit decoder socket.