I was interested to see the various comments about the Jackson coupling. I have almost completed the job of changing all couplings to this type... my stock is all OO and comprises Triang, Hornby, Lima and scratch built with fairly scant attention to coarse or fine scale.
The over riding benefit of this coupling is that it is realistic and entirely unobtrusive when in action and permits buffer to buffer reversing, providing that all track, particularly points, are large radius. My layout is end to end and is designed with the coupling in mind....in practical terms there are no points of a radii less than that of the Peco large radius "streamline" , some home built are a finer radius.
As mentioned, the conversion of my stock is not quite complete. It is without doubt extremely time consuming as each individual item of stock has to be treated as a one off, and there is little scope for mass producing. Having said that the material cost per coupling is a few pennies.
Depending on the make of rolling stock conversion can entail some quite ruthless alteration to the undersides particularly in way of the original coupling fitments but none of this is visible when on track . No alteration in any way is required on buffer beams, buffers etc.
Is anyone else dabbling in this business.
Tiebar