QUOTE (Richard Johnson @ 19 Aug 2008, 13:06)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>.. It takes a lot of emotion stirred in the public to prize the money out of them for such an expensive project... so flair and imagination are needed, as is an image that'd stir a wide spectrum of emotions ..
That's part of the reason why I think the P2 with A4 style streamlined front is a good one to go for. The A4 shape still appears in current railway advertising in the UK, because the wedge shaped nose is where its' at for fast rail travel today. If it looks right, it is right.
The other factors are that it is big, giving it the power and performance potential mentioned; and the uniqueness of the concept for the UK. We have characteristic examples of pretty much everything else significant in the UK steam traction story, both preserved and operational, save this one eight coupled passenger class, and the Garratts. (Not quite true, you have to go to Mulhouse to see the Crampton and Outrance 4-4-0)
The UK Garratts would be an operational nightmare: too slow for present mainline operation, much too big for a preservation operation. You have to go to Oz or Africa to see one, where they can really be appreciated. Are any of these monsters still given a run out in Australia? Footplated on a Zim railways garratt up the Vic falls incline, 1 in 39; that was a very good day.