Model Railway Forum banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
11 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I came upon this old film footage.
And have a look at the signaling school, who does would not like a layout working like that?

http://www.britishpathe.com/video/railway-...ol-aka-railways

I found this footage searching for a good book on British semafoor signals, preferably LNER type.
What I'm looking for is the way they are placed, especially junction signal and speeds connected to certain signal images.
Does anyone has any tips for me?

I already have found a few good websites like "Signalbox"
http://www.signalbox.org/index.php

But it's a good book on the topic that I'm after, who has a tip for me?

Cheers,
Danny
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,181 Posts
Hi Danny, Yes i have seen them Before very interesting Indeed. Can i ask you a Question on your mixed freight trains Do you notice the difference very much when you are very heavy or does the Lok take the load with ease, I used to Drive Jets and we found that when we were empty ( No Pax ) It was more different in Handling to when it had a Heavy Payload. Babs
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,181 Posts
Hi Danny, Yes i have seen them Before very interesting Indeed. Can i ask you a Question on your mixed freight trains Do you notice the difference very much when you are very heavy or does the Lok take the load with ease, I used to Drive Jets and we found that when we were empty ( No Pax ) It was more different in Handling to when it had a Heavy Payload. Babs
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
257 Posts
I enjoyed viewing the Signal School video.
It reminds me of a summer holiday in Weymouth where I saw a working O gauge railway layout which I believe was used for training. It was set up in a church hall so must have been portable. Guess it was in the early to mid 50's.
I understand there is a similar training layout displayed at the NRM in York.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,681 Posts
QUOTE (Danny Vanstraelen @ 19 Aug 2016, 10:02) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>But it's a good book on the topic that I'm after, who has a tip for me?
Basically there isn't a really good book in the model world - never has been. You could try looking for Lewis's Railway Signal Engineering (Mechanical). (1932)


I don't recall where I got it from but I include the following...

"Preface to the First Edition.

The object of this book is to provide a brief outline of the general principles of Mechanical Railway Signal Engineering (excluding power worked signals, etc.), with examples of their practical application, in a form suitable for men who are engaged in railway work, but not necessarily in connection with the Signalling Engineer's Department.

In order to assist readers who may not be familiar with the terms and names of apparatus employed in railway signalling most of the technical terms have been explained and the apparatus illustrated, as they occur, but, in a few cases the description of apparatus is given later in the book; reference to the index will enable readers to find the description required.

No attempt has been made to describe every piece of apparatus employed on British Railways, nor yet to give the signalling practice of every railway company; as far as possible, however, the average practice of British railways is given.

Railway signalling practice in Greta Britain has not yet been rigidly standardised, and there has been no serious attempt on the part of the various railway companies to adopt the same standard materials and apparatus.

Every railway company carrying passengers is subject to the regulations of the Board of Trade, and all important railways have adopted the Block telegraph Rules of the Railway Clearing House (with slight modifications), so to that extent the main principles of British railway signalling have been standardised. In minor details each company employs its own particular practice."


This sometimes shows up on E Bay - but can be pricey. It's a "standard text"

C. Byles The first principles of railway signalling including legislation in the United Kingdom (1910) Would be another appropriate text - BUT - both will include a lot of material that you would probably consider too detailed - like the parts of various signals.

For immediately post-war (Mk2) jno Aitken was actually an LNER Inspector. Be careful though - there are several books, not all of which would necessarily be useful for you.



I found this footage includes the usual error - lever put back in the frame and signal clears
searching for a good book on British semaphore signals, preferably LNER type.
What I'm looking for is the way they are placed, left side of the track to which they apply (as seen by approaching train crew) and over the track as far as the centre line is standard. Anything placed further right is "Wrong Side". Signals can be wrong side - but - there has to be a good reason for it. Along the track - for your period and semaphore signals - the signals are placed a (very) short distance before whatever it is that you don't want trains to hit. So - for level crossing gates the protecting signal( would tend to be a few feet on the approach to the gates - there being a signal each way of course. (Which raises the question of "what signal?" - Right direction running you want a Running Signal (4foot Stop arm. For any shunt move - essentially "wrong direction" you want a non-Running Signal - i.e a shunt signal - a dummy or a 2foot arm. The most significant thing is that signals must be where approaching train crew will see them clearly and not misread them. especially junction signa All signals for diverging routes - including dummies for setting across crossovers or into sidings - would go as close to the toe of the points as possible (the toe is the pointy end that waggles). This is so that the interlocking holds the points while any signalled movement is taking place - and so that the point blades cannot be shifted if/when something is between the signal and the toe of the points. This can, however, be got around by installing a Track Circuit or Detection Bar that will hold the points while anything is on the relevant length of track - either allows the signal to be further from the toe. However - for the LNER in the 30s this was only coming into significant use on the more busy/wealthy routes and only when resignalling schemes were introduced. Keep in mind that most of your signalling would be pre 1930 - probably pre 1920 and more likely pre World War 1 - extending back further and further to the 1880s with the lowering of significance of the line. Installing signalling has always been expensive. It therefore lasts unless traffic not only needs it to be changed but pays for it.l and speeds connected to certain signal images. UK Signalling is "Route Signalling" using "Position Value" for semaphore - NOT "Speed Signalling" (Except the Mirfield Colour Light experimemt). These are whole "other subjects". See how you get on with this lot and then ask some more.

Does anyone has any tips for me?
Don't


You could go mad and look through this forum for posts by me... Or John Webb.

Oh and get any picture book of LNER and constituent companies (check the date of pictures) and go through carefully looking at what signals there are and where. Don't expect to fully understand what you see though - a lot of railwaymen can get somewhat muddled - especially as pictures don't always give a 100% image of what was going on.

Actually - thinking about it - you could get the Wild Swan book on modelling GWR branch lines that includes signalling for a basic guide to start you off - Just DO NOT believe the chapter on how trains were worked.

Cheers,
Danny
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,565 Posts
Danny,

This book is LNER specific and focuses on technical elements of signalling practice.

A Pictorial Record of LNER Constituent Signalling

This may not be exactly what you are after but it's a fascinating read.

Best regards ................ Greyvoices (alias John)
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
11 Posts
Wow, quite a respons here where fore thank you very much.


@Babz
What do jou mean with Jets, is it as in aircraft, wouldn't you fly than?

The amounts of freight you can pull depends on basically on two factors.
The profile of the line and type of locomotive.
The people who compose a train are responsible for knowing on witch route a train will take to reach is destiny.
And what type of locomotive is going to do the job, so they know what power is at their disposal.
A computer program calculates exactly how much freight they can give with you.
It all comes down to the speed that train must achieve.
Of course the heavier a train is the longer it takes to come up to speed.
But with a Traxx you have 7000 Hp and 350 Kn (kilo newton) at you disposal, so you come quite fast up to speed, for a train that is.

@Greyvoices (alias John)
That was a very good tip, the book is ordered


@Bear 1923
My dear friend that was quite an answer

First of all, the books are on the book list, they all look very interesting, especially the first one.

What I'm looking for is the way they are placed, left side of the track to which they apply (as seen by approaching train crew) and over the track as far as the centre line is standard. Anything placed further right is "Wrong Side". Signals can be wrong side - but - there has to be a good reason for it.

This I understand, it's basically the same as here in Belgium as we copied the British system.
I bought a few Ratio kits of LNER signals.


And my question of placement concerns particularly the "Bracket" type of signals.
That the arm on the pylon itself of the distant signal points to the right, that would make sense.
but if you look at the pylon of the home signal points to the left does not make any sense to me.
Why isn't that pointed also to the right?
Or is the pylon placed right in this case, but due that the arm hangs over the line , it must be seen as standing on the left?

l and speeds connected to certain signal images. UK Signalling is "Route Signalling" using "Position Value" for semaphore - NOT "Speed Signalling"

Ok, I do understand that a signal doesn't give you a speedlimit like a road sign, but I can't believe that a train that sees a closed distant signal could run up at any random speed to the home signal?
Or lets say you have a series of home & distant combined signals.
And the distant signal is each time closed, in such a case we are not allowed to go over 40Kmh here in Belgium, Germany has a similar rule, isn't this also the case in the UK?

0r at the first movement of a train, it basely can't run at full speed, until it sees it's first home signal.
Isn't there a speed limit then?

And how are speeds of a certain line given at that time?
Here in Belgium we have plates next to the line, that indicate the speed you aloud to go.
In Germany they work with a book, that you read as a map so to speak, and this book point out the max. speeds for that particular train.
Very difficult and not paper friendly, although we have an electronic system now, you still have to have the paper version with you incase of electronic failure.

Anyway thank you all for the response.

Cheers,
Danny
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,681 Posts
I will get back more during tomorrow...

But - for now...

The structure supporting a signal - wheteher it's semaphore or light - doesn't contribute anything to the meaning of the signal. All the structure does is put the indication in the best place to do its job.
I will get back a bit more specifically later.

Speed... Speed limits are indicated track side - by "stencil"/ cut-out types for your period. These days they use road style reflectorised signs. It is also published in the route charts in the Sectional Appendix of the Rule Book... That's for Permanent speeds (PSRs). Temporary restrictions appear in Special Traffic Notices (STNs) and Weekly Traffic Notices (WTNs). Emergency Speeds get special signage on the track and daily notices in the Drivers' crew rooms and signing on points. Other sxtra measures can be imposed. The most significant factor is train crews' route knowledge - which puts all the rest into context for the train they are working and environmental conditions - as I'm sure you know.

A Stop Signal says "Stop" when "On". When cleared it permits a train crew to proceed when safe to do so and as safe to do so. It says absolutely nothing about speed.
A Distant Signal - on its own or slotted to a Stop Signal (i.e. a Distant under a Stop on the same post) tells train crew that the next Stop Signal or group of Stop Signals that will be approached are at Stop at the time of sighting when it is "On" (at Caution). This tells the train crew to reduce speed so that they will be able to Stop Dead at the first (next) Stop Signal they arrive at. Distant Signals are normally placed at braking distance from the first Stop signal to which they apply... Which - I'm sure you will realise - raises a whole bunch of questions about "what is braking distance?" !!!
When "Off" (proceed) a Distant tells train crew that the associated Stop Signals are all "Of". The interlocking prevents a Distant being cleared (to "Off") except when all associated Stop Signals have been cleared and are showing "Off" - this can be tied into electrical proving that the Stop Signals are actually showing a correct "off".
In various circumstances Distants a fixed at "Caution" and can never indicate a "Clear).

There's a whole bunch more - but this gets you started.

The Stop on the doll of the bracket to the left is no different in meaning from the Stop on the straight post. The bracket is simply used to get the signal where it will be best seen - allowing the S&T to put the structure where it can be fitted in around the track.
This "fitting in" is often the result of the earliest railways having been built (and subsequently confined within other features) with no thought at all for signalling. Later developments - added lines, alterations and other things - like structures outside the railway boundary - can have impacted on what has to be done.

Hope this helps/clarifies.

 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,681 Posts
I'm going to answer your questions in some detail - nit just because I like to waffle - but - because they are very good/useful questions - and other modellers looking at this might benefit by my waffling... Or they may just use it to cure insomnia.


QUOTE (Danny Vanstraelen @ 20 Aug 2016, 21:11) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>@Bear 1923
My dear friend that was quite an answer

First of all, the books are on the book list, they all look very interesting, especially the first one.
Lewis is certainly very useful
(I have possibly just put up its auction price...
).

QUOTE What I'm looking for is the way they are placed, left side of the track to which they apply (as seen by approaching train crew) and over the track as far as the centre line is standard. Anything placed further right is "Wrong Side". Signals can be wrong side - but - there has to be a good reason for it.

This I understand, it's basically the same as here in Belgium as we copied the British system.

Do you run on the left as well? I suspect that some of your early signalling equipment my have been bought in from the UK?
Of course running on the left is running on the right side.


QUOTE I bought a few Ratio kits of LNER signals.

Not necessarily the "best"/most accurate as models - but - for your scheme probably sensible. Have you used 00 in the garden before? It's unusual - but - not impossible.

QUOTE And my question of placement concerns particularly the "Bracket" type of signals.
That the arm on the pylon itself of the distant signal points to the right, that would make sense.
but if you look at the pylon of the home signal points to the left does not make any sense to me.
Why isn't that pointed also to the right?
Or is the pylon placed right in this case, but due that the arm hangs over the line , it must be seen as standing on the left?

From a purely physical point of view, taking posts planted to the left of the track to which they apply...
A bracket to the right can be used to push the doll and consequently the signal arm (or head for a Colour Light {CL}) out over the centre line of the track. This can occur due to the line ahead of an approaching train being curved to the left. It can also occur due to a structure between the approach and the signal tending to obscure the sighting of the signal- this can be any structure (including outside the boundary). The more usual structures to cause this are platform canopies and passenger footbridges. There is a third possible cause - this is less obvious - but - I'm sure that as a Driver you will be aware of it - it is the background of the signal - as in - you need a nice clear look at the indication - without anything beyond it confusing the issue. Semaphore signals can have a "sighting board" behind them to assist - this can be provided on any signal structure. Different companies used different designs. (CLs can have a sighting board as well - but it is far less common).
A bracket to the left is appropriate for the same reasons - curvature to the right being the first case. Sometimes, where ground space is available, the signal post will simply be placed further to the left of the rail head than usual. A bracket may be used when the ground is not clear. With CLs it is more common than with semaphores for signals to be sat up on top of retaining walls to the left of the track. As always the over-riding issue is that the crew will get a good view of the signal - as I'm sure you appreciate. As far as structures go - the big cause of bracketing to the left is to put the signal over the centre line of the track where there is a structure on the right hand side - and probably a lack of space on the left hand side... This occurs largely with island platforms and for "turn back" signals - "Turn Back" signals are those where trains terminate on a through line and start back from the same platform - this is massively more common with CLs than with semaphores - this is a direct consequence of the differences between line-of-sight/mechanical signalling and train detection/track circuit signalling. The requirements (limitations) of mechanical interlocking make a Turn Back far more difficult and costly than the capabilities of relay interlocking.

Brackets that put the signal out to a position half way over the track to which they apply are pretty straightforward. Brackets can also have a longer reach. It is not unusual for a longer bracket to reach over a siding or loop line to achieve a Stop Signal being placed in the correct place for the Running Line. Similarly the signal for a fast line might be bracketed out over a slow line. This can also be worked the opposite way around. Where there is nowhere for a post to be planted on the left side of the track a bracket may be used from the right with a longer reach extending over the opposite line - or again - the extension may be over a line in the same direction.

Once we consider this it all seems horribly obvious - except that it isn't obvious - until it is "obvious". Why go to the expense of a large bracket structure if it's only to get the signal into place and it doesn't add meaning to the signal? The logic is mostly found in the history of where the signal is and when it was put there. As I've said, this begins with the original track arrangement not being designed to be signalled. Subsequently re-arrangement of the track - additions and extensions in particular - can create causes for inventive ways of getting the signal where it needs to be. Then again - further developments can leave a signal looking strangely over-built - this is usually the reduction of tracks.
Another factor impacting on signal placing and therefore signal structures is the speed capacity of trains. I'm sure that you know that signal placement is directly related not to the higher speed capacity of trains but to their capacity to stop.
I hope that this makes things clear.


QUOTE l and speeds connected to certain signal images. UK Signalling is "Route Signalling" using "Position Value" for semaphore - NOT "Speed Signalling"

Ok, I do understand that a signal doesn't give you a speed limit like a road sign, but I can't believe that a train that sees a closed distant signal could run up at any random speed to the home signal?
Or lets say you have a series of home & distant combined signals.
And the distant signal is each time closed, in such a case we are not allowed to go over 40Kmh here in Belgium, Germany has a similar rule, isn't this also the case in the UK?

As before - a Distant signal that is "On" - at "Caution" instructs the train crew that the associated Stop Signal(s) are also "On" and that speed must be reduced so that the train can be stopped dead before it reaches the next/first associated Stop Signal.
I have to keep referring to an "associated" Stop Signal due to Slotted Distants. In the case of a slotted Outer Distant the instruction will apply to the first Stop Signal of the next group of Stop Signals and not the Stop Signal over the slotted Inner Distant. Things are so much easier when colour light signals are used! (So long as you don't get involved with GWR usage of Searchlight signals!)

So... The key is to look at where Distant signals get used.
Distants - rather than Repeater Signals in CL/TRack Circuit Block) - are a feature of Absolute Block and its derivatives. (I am not going to deal with derivatives).
In AB the line is divided into Block Sections and Station Limits.
Station Limits are the lines from the first Stop Signal to the last Stop Signal in each direction of the one Signalbox that is a Block Post. At the usual maximum length this will be from the Outer Home to the Advanced Starter. The Advanced Starter will be the Section Signal - entry into the Block Section ahead.
The Block Section id therefore the line - in one direction only - from the last Stop Signal/Section Signal of one Block Post Signalbox to the first Stop Signal of the next Block Post that is "open" (i.e. switched into the Block Circuit system).
Distant Signals, occurring on the approach to the Stop Signal(s) to which they apply are therefore inside the Block Section.
Distant Signals enable approaching trains to maintain speed without signal-check whenever they are "Off" indicating "proceed"... Being interlocked so that they can only show "Off" when all the associated Stop Signals are also "off" means that an approaching crew knows that all the Stop Signals of the Station Limits are also "off" at the time of sighting the Distant and that they can therefore proceed straight through the Station Limits into the Block Section beyond the Station limits. This does not effect any station/platform stops, stops for water (steam engines) or any other activity that a train may need to achieve in Station Limits. The Distant simply says that all the Stop Signals are "off".
A Distant Signal being "off" does not mean that all the Stop Signals will still be "off" when the train arrives at them. An emergency may cause the Distant to be put back "on" and the Stop(s) to be put on before the approaching crew reach the first Stop Signal. This can result in a SPAD - "Signal Passed at Danger". It also tends to cause train crew to need to make a change of trousers. An approaching crew seeing a Stop against them after the Distant was clear will make a lot of noise on the whistle/horn. They are likely to make further, verbal, noise after they have stopped safely. For some reason crews running on clear signals get upset if they have them "put back" on them.

Distants are placed at a calculated Standard Braking Distance (SBD) from the first Stop Signal to which they apply. The SBD is calculated on the line condition, gradient, curvature and the permitted speeds of trains on the line. The permitted speed may be adjusted (downward) to accommodate issues relating to the SBD.

Where signalboxes (not necessarily Block Posts) are located close together along the line the SBD of one box may run into the signalled area of the box on the approach to it. In this case the Distant Signal for the second box approached will be placed under the last Stop Signal of the first box. Put simply - if there are two non-block level crossing boxes close together the Distant for the second one will be under the Stop Signal of the first.
Once we deal with Block Post Boxes we can get Inner and Outer slotted Distants under consecutive Stop Signals of the first Box approached.
When boxes are extra close together the 2nd box's Distant may be combined with that of the first box. (Slotted with it).

See what happens when you ask questions?


QUOTE 0r at the first movement of a train, it basely can't run at full speed, until it sees it's first home signal.
Isn't there a speed limit then?

Okay... Leaving a Station Limits a train can run through the Block Section at any speed up to the PSR (Permanent Speed Restriction) that is safe until the Distant Signal of the next (open/working) Station Limits. When the Distant is sighted the speed will depend on whether it is "on"/at caution/ "against" the movement - in which case speed must be reduced as described --- OR - the movement can carry on at any safe speed up to the PSR through the Station Limits.
(When the Signalbox/Block Post of a Station Limits is switched out of circuit it doesn't exist as far as the Block System is concerned. The relevant signals on the track have to all be left in the "Off" position to avoid unduly delaying trains.

I should comment that, while there is much descriptive complication in both modelling and real railway literature, there is a distinct difference between a Home Signal and a Stop Signal. Basically, ALL signals that can show a Red aspect are Stop Signals. Home Signals are only those signals on the approach side of a Signalbox (whether it is a Block Post or not). Stop Signals beyond the Signalbox/Block Post are "Starters". (This is so long as you don't get into LMS practice - they called all their Stop Signals Homes except for the last Stop Signal/Section Signal... But then - the LMS are always difficult!)

QUOTE And how are speeds of a certain line given at that time?

So... Adding to the above... When a Stop Signal is cleared a crew may move at any safe speed up to the PSR with whatever acceleration they can achieve. Their Route Knowledge will tell them where the next Stop Signal to look out for is. They will know whether they are within Station Limits and therefore need to look out for the next Stop Signal immediately or they are entering the Block Section - in which case their next Stop Signal may be very close - or - several miles ahead. In addition - when in a Block Section they will have the Distant Signal to look out for.

This deals with Stop Signals - which are Running Signals. Running Signals are - in the words of our training schools - the signals controlling movements that are making journeys - "going from town to town". Put another way - they are the big signals that can be seen in good time by crews approaching at speed.

Then there are Non-Running Signals. These are all the little signals - shunts and subsidiaries -(the "miniature" arm misnamed in the Ratio document). These are often Ground Signals or small arms placed under Stop Signals. they are all the signals that don't want to be seen by crews moving at speed in Running Movements.

Running Signals, when showing proceed, permit movement up to the PSR. The line from one Running Stop Signal to the next will be clear for movement. (Unless an uncontrolled emergency occurs - which is why you have to keep looking at the line ahead).
Non-Running Signals, when showing proceed, ONLY permit movement at a speed allowing the movement to stop dead short of any obstruction.

The results are...
Drawing past a Running Signal that is off a crew can go up to the PSR immediately. Drawing past a Non Running Signal the crew have to proceed with caution, prepared to stop dead.

For this reason a cleared Running Signal/Stop Signal always gives approach to another Running Signal/Stop Signal - except when running onto buffer stop lights in a passenger terminal. (A multiple aspect CL Running Signal will only give a Yellow aspect in this situation).
A Non running Signal may give approach to either a Running Signal or a Non running Signal. When the first occurs the movement must be made at caution until the Running Signal is approached - when that signal must be obeyed.

QUOTE Here in Belgium we have plates next to the line, that indicate the speed you aloud to go.
In Germany they work with a book, that you read as a map so to speak, and this book point out the max. speeds for that particular train.
Very difficult and not paper friendly, although we have an electronic system now, you still have to have the paper version with you in case of electronic failure.
I covered this before.


QUOTE Anyway thank you all for the response.

Cheers,
Danny

That's okay.
Good questions give me practice at explaining - and hopefully getting better at it...


 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,681 Posts
Ahem...
That signal that Ratio describe as "splitting" is only a two doll signal.

While a number of dolls may apply to a number of optional routes beyond the signal it is also possible for a pair of signals on one bracket to apply to two separate tracks in the same direction - keeping in mind that the left hand doll (with the signal on it) will be "Wrong Side".
This usually happens at the departure end of an island platform - that has the signalled facility to send departures away in the same direction from both sides of the island.

 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
11 Posts
QUOTE (Bear 1923 @ 21 Aug 2016, 09:02) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>...Do you run on the left as well? I suspect that some of your early signalling equipment my have been bought in from the UK?
Of course running on the left is running on the right side.
...

Oh yes, British rail and Belgian rail go hand in hand.
Our first king Leopold 1 who was the cousin of Queen Victoria.
He wanted to build Belgium as a young modern state.
His best friend John Cockerill, who was a Belgian steal giant for it's time, was on his terms a good friend of George Stephenson.
So, both men had the right connections at the time, and this resulted as Belgian being the second country in the world that run a railway.
So on invitation, it was George Stephenson himself who came over in 1834 tho build the first line between Mechelen and Brussels.
The first 3 locomotives where "Le Flèche" (the arrow), "Le Eléphant" (the elephant) and "Le Stephenson", all George Stephenson designs made with parts imported out of the UK and parts license build by John Cockerill.
As a matter of fact if you ever should visit Mechelen station, in front of it stands a blue stone pole that is the 0Km pole of the Belgian rail network, and is still the original of with the opening of the rail network 1835.

That's why we also drive on the left, and rest is history


A while ago I made a small film of the oder crossing the Belgian (Montzen) German (Aachen) Border.
It starts where you see the signals normal left hand placed like in the UK.
Than we go over to the right hand (German system) and you see form there all Belgian signals wrong placed right hand up to the first German signal.
This is the only section in Belgium where you see the signals placed like that.
On the bridge you'll see a sign like this "-" this means pantograph must be down, the locomotive is manually switched from 3000V DC to 15000V AC when the sign "I" appears the pantograph is put up again.
This is all done at a speed of 90Kmh, enjoy.

QUOTE (Bear 1923 @ 21 Aug 2016, 09:02) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
See what happens when you ask questions?

Don't worry, it all makes sense to me
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,565 Posts
Danny you are right about the Anglo - Belgian association which is rather interesting. We make a lot of noise about George Stephenson supplying the first German locomotive (Der Adler in 1836) but he was contracted by the investors of Nuremberg at a meeting in Antwerp in 1835. He was there because of his involvement in the building of the Brussels to Antwerp railway, the first section getting as far as Mechelen (or as the Mechelenese like to have it, the first section getting as far as Brussels. The northern part to Antwerp was delayed for a few months because of the slow build of the bridge just to the north of Mechelen station.

On another note:

In more modern times I was very impressed with the diesel engines supplied for the SNCB Class 77 locomotives manufactured by ABC (Anglo Belgian Corporation of Gent). I liked these lumps because they only needed a refurbishment once every 50,000 hours whereas a modern diesel engine has to be rebuilt once every 10,000 hours. of course there is a penalty to pay in increased intermediate maintenance but with the efficiency of Belgian loco depots such as the one I visited in Antwerp the overall life cycle costs for the Class 77 compared very favourably with other more modern units. In this century Voith offered a variant of their Maxima class with an ABC lump I think to be attractive to the Benelux region but unfortunately the axle-weight limited it's use over certain routes when double heading.
The fact that ABC was formed just prior to WW1 and the UK element of investment never materialised ........... yet the company chose to retain the word "Anglo" in its title is symptomatic of the export cache of British goods at that time (I fear not quite so pronounced 100 years later).

Best regards .............. Greyvoices (alias John)
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,565 Posts
Indeed you might have done Bear and on British Railways I once negotiated a top and tail consist using Class 20's to run a special working over an RA 1 bridge. The Leading Class 20 to detach and run over the bridge light engine followed by the rear 20 pushing the train across the bridge, the wagons then reattached to the leading loco with the rear 20 detaching and moving across the bridge also as a light engine. You can imagine the hours of discussion with the civil engineers and then an operations inspector to get that move approved and listed in the WON (Weekly Operating Notice).

Sorry Danny for highjacking your thread but I think as a fellow railwayman you know exactly what we are talking about.

The restricted section in Belgium which precluded the use of Voith Maxima in tandem was Namur <> Luxemburg.

Best regards .................. Greyvoices (alias John)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,681 Posts
Didn't mean to hijack...

I think you know that - that we're talking (straying into) having fun with the job. The weird events are far more interesting than the routine


Oh - and some of us on here do like to/tend to wander off wherever things take us... Only get our wrists slapped occasionally - which is one of the good things about the forum - we can learn so much.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,181 Posts
Danny, You Wrote Back
"
@Babz
What do jou mean with Jets, is it as in aircraft, wouldn't you fly than? biggrin.gif
The amounts of freight you can pull depends on basically on two factors.
The profile of the line and type of locomotive.
The people who compose a train are responsible for knowing on witch route a train will take to reach is destiny.
And what type of locomotive is going to do the job, so they know what power is at their disposal.
A computer program calculates exactly how much freight they can give with you.
It all comes down to the speed that train must achieve.
Of course the heavier a train is the longer it takes to come up to speed.
But with a Traxx you have 7000 Hp and 350 Kn (kilo newton) at you disposal, so you come quite fast up to speed, for a train that is.

Yes I do Mean Flying Jets as in Airliners and they handle Quite differently when they are Light or up to Max Payload.. You have answered my Question Thank you Most interesting indeed. Happy Model Railways. Babs
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top