Model Railway Forum banner

Why is there only one channel tunnel?

3646 Views 28 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  dwb
(I do have a serious query at the end)

I was trying to lay track in a straight line and despite the use of a straight tracksetta and then the edge of a quality one metre level, I was still veering one way or the other after a meagre 4 or 5 feet. From where I was laying the track everything seemed fine until I made two checks:-

1) Can I still fit the other running line, platform and two outer tracks in the space left before everything falls off the edge of the baseboard? If not, start again.
2) If I walk to the end of the line and cast my eye can I see a kink? If yes, start again.

Twice these checks failed and each time the deviation was barely perceptible at the point it started, neither did the straight edges I was using show it up.

Whilst pondering on my difficulty of keeping straight over a distance of 12 feet I wondered how you got to the moon without missing by rather a long way. Then I decided that it didn't matter, you just kept adjusting your course so that you were pointed at the moon, after all it is rather large and you can see it. But then I wondered what if you can't see your target such as the other half of a tunnel. A fraction of a degree off and as the joke about the 2 man quote to build a tunnel goes - "If we miss, then you get two tunnels for the price of one".

I realised that the Chunnel builders probably used GPS and lasers. But I didn't think that GPS would work to the tolerance I needed, though a laser level was a possibility. A quick google showed that basic models can be had for about £20 from Amazon but that still seemed like overkill, so before nipping down to B & Q I tried one last ploy.

I performed my number 1 check above at 4 foot intervals and secured a 4 inch piece of offcut track where the outer rail should be. Then I got a long half inch wide measuring tape - the kind builders use, it's about 28 ft long and doesn't like to kink left or right - and laid it between the rails of the 4 inch offcuts. Now I was able to use the tape as a guide to laying the track I wanted without any further dramas. The result is completely straight - a bit like the track from the opening of Once upon a time in the west - but it's near enough and once a train is standing on it you don't notice.

Query:
Whilst on (or near) the subject of the channel tunnel, I was thinking of using it this summer but I don't quite understand why there is a reasonable price and totally out of this world price. What are you not getting for the cheap fare? I have heard that maybe you get to wait a lot for some trainspotting if you haven't paid the ransom. Is this true?

David
See less See more
21 - 29 of 29 Posts
there are several reasons. on one club layout i was involved with the fiddle yard could be put together with the centre boards in any order (and the end boards were also identical). this made setting up even easied as it didnt matter which order the boards were packed away in or taken out.

also it looke neat.

although prototypes vary, on modern lines the distance between the tracks is often very closely monitored for aerodynamic and noise reasons. often it dosent need to be straight but it does need to be VERY accurate.
The same applies to a model.

Peter
I've always just done it by sight. I've never really seen the need to get a theodolite or laser or whatever. But having said that my current layout is only three metres long so there isn't a lot of scope to screw up. Now if I had a big layout I guess accuracy would be a lot more important.
See less See more
Here's an example of what you can see with a laser level. As you can see the track is not directly aligned with the crossing, but I'm not inclined to do anything about it now.



I am going to have to do something about the track on left. It is set to a strict 10 foot gap but I think it would be better the gap closed a little to give an even curve. This is the reception track for arriving goods trains. The widening gap in the middle distance is to accommodate the signal box for this end of the station. At the last count, I estimated it would have about 60 to 70 levers.

David
See less See more
I can't see what the laser gains you over a simple piece of thread unless your light is poor.
>I can't see what the laser gains you over a simple piece of thread unless your light is poor.
Speed and simplicity. I've been down the thread route. Remember the laser thingy only cost £3.99 + batteries.

David
QUOTE (Mark Thornton @ 14 Oct 2006, 13:51) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I can't see what the laser gains you over a simple piece of thread unless your light is poor.

Nothing wrong with new technology - if new technology does not "gain" anything then maybe we should leave the forum, start a "paper" group off & await several weeks for replies to our questions/queries ! (TIC).

best regards
Brian
Will I have jst used the peco track set 'thingy' and as long as i started off straight it looks good, but as it has already been said, network metals arn't true so its a touch of reality in model form! It also looks better snaking aroung on a long length

Bro Sewell
QUOTE (dwb @ 14 Oct 2006, 21:08) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Here's an example of what you can see with a laser level. As you can see the track is not directly aligned with the crossing, but I'm not inclined to do anything about it now.



I am going to have to do something about the track on left. It is set to a strict 10 foot gap but I think it would be better the gap closed a little to give an even curve. This is the reception track for arriving goods trains. The widening gap in the middle distance is to accommodate the signal box for this end of the station. At the last count, I estimated it would have about 60 to 70 levers.

David
Well that track on the left looks like I laid it on a good day. Seriously though, a chalk line has to be the way to go surely ?
See less See more
>Seriously though, a chalk line has to be the way to go surely ?
All right, I give in, I confess. I'm a hopeless spendthrift and gadget freak. I promise not to do it again - NOT.

It was only a suggestion. It's a free country. If you want to mess about with chalk, which sends shivers down my spine just writing about it, go ahead, I won't stop you.

:mock seriousness: - whatever that is?
David
21 - 29 of 29 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top