To butler-henderson
Hi there. Thank you for your response. I understand what you are saying and it is probably the most sensible action to take. However, I’ll explain my reasoning, for not taking that road, which most people will probably find insane.
I am of an age whereby, when I was a young boy, the era I lived in was one of make do and mend, as most consumer goods were in short supply and costly to get hold of. Consequently, the “mindset” drilled into me was if it was fixable then fix it or get it fixed.
Subsequently, peoples’ belongings, even clothes, lasted for as long as possible. If any of my toys broke they were still played with as a new one was not forthcoming. In the middle to late 1950’s I looked with envy in toy shop windows at the Hornby and Triang range of electric trains knowing that my family would never to able to afford to get me any.
Over the years, therefore, this “mindset”, so well engrained, has stuck with me and I find it difficult to get rid of an item that still works unless it is completely destroyed. I know that for decades now we live in a throw-away society and if something new becomes available then the old is discarded, irrespective of its functionality. This behaviour is obviously encouraged by Manufacturers, through advertising, and this can be understood because if you don’t keep your Sales going and increase your profits then your Company will no longer exist. But it must impact on the limited resources this world holds (No, I’m not a Greenie). It also horrifies me that it can be cheaper to buy a new item than get one repaired. (I have in a draw 3 or 4 good mechanical watches which have stopped working but are just probably in need of a good internal clean and oiling. The prices quoted to do this are nearly double the price of a new one. Crazy!).
So when I retired, on a reasonable pension, I started collecting all those trains that I could not have as a child. All of them obtained from EBAY with prices that were now “reasonable”! It is a credit to the Hornby Dublo and Triang Hornby manufacturing that these “toys”, now well over 50 and 60 years old, are still in existence and capable of running. The amount of moulding detail, by today’s standards, may be poor but they still look good running around a track. Thus if I have something, like this Mainline Class 42, that fails I feel uncomfortable to throw it away. In this case the body is fine so why dispose of it. (Judging by the number of Class 42 bodies on offer on EBAY others must have the same problem).
With regard to the motor, well I have sent it off to get it, hopefully, rewound and re-magnetised. So if I go the full hog and get the brass cogs the money spent in getting it back together again will way outweigh its value. Totally illogical isn’t it? But I will have the pleasure of seeing it run again.
However, after all it is a hobby. Lots of people have hobbies that they throw money at that appears to be a “waste”, but if it makes them happy that’s fine. Again, judging by the amount of spares offered on the Internet, and the people who make a business out of supplying them, there must be others like me who like repairing them. So I can’t be the only nutcase in the Forum can I? Can I???
It was nice to get this off my chest.
Regards
Old Codger